|
Post by meldrew on Jan 5, 2011 21:00:48 GMT 1
Are some alien visitors infact time travellers ? can time travel be a possibilty ? according to the Anderson Institute it is possible and will be a reality, beware of some really big words on this site www.andersoninstitute.com/
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 5, 2011 21:04:26 GMT 1
Are some alien visitors infact time travellers ? can time travel be a possibilty ? according to the Anderson Institute it is possible and will be a reality, beware of some really big words on this site www.andersoninstitute.com/If im not mistaken Stephen Hawkings talked about time travel being possible in his Documentarys
|
|
|
Post by meldrew on Jan 5, 2011 23:34:25 GMT 1
Are some alien visitors infact time travellers ? can time travel be a possibilty ? according to the Anderson Institute it is possible and will be a reality, beware of some really big words on this site www.andersoninstitute.com/If im not mistaken Stephen Hawkings talked about time travel being possible in his Documentarys I think Stephen Hawking spoke of wormholes, David Anderson researches time warped fields, Anderson: Of course. The Time Travel Research Center is a privately-owned research laboratory based on Long Island, New York in the United States of America. The company was founded in 1995 and is exclusively dedicated to the advancement of the science, technology and research that will deliver practical time control and someday time travel capabilities. I believe we are a leader in the development of capabilities to pursue this goal and are the only company of its kind dedicated exclusively to pursuing the achievement of time control and time travel. We support private research and development and also pioneered and manage the development of the TRI-STAR Information System which is the worlds largest knowledge base of science, technology, and research applicable to the subject of time and time travel. The TRI-STAR system’s simulation programs also represent one of the most advanced space-time virtual laboratories in the world today, designed and optimized specifically for research in this field of study. The Center also founded and manages the Time Travel Research Association, the largest time travel interest group in the world. GMD: I have heard a lot about the Time Travel Research Association. But before we discuss this could you tell us exactly how did you get started? How does someone become interested and involved in time control research and development? Anderson: It initially began when I was very young. I suppose I had developed a strong interest and ability in mathematics and physics at an early age. After scoring very high on a government exam of some type the United States Air Force began repeatedly trying to recruit me to join the Air Force and participate in their advanced research and development programs. This continued for a couple years during high school and while I was finishing my undergraduate degree program at West Virginia University. At the time I didn’t know that I might be involved specifically in space-time research, but it was a strong interest for me at this time. I finally accepted their offer and then spent almost five years as a United States Air Force Officer, Flight Test Engineer, and Scientist, conducting advanced space-time research at the prestigious Air Force Flight Test Center in the Mojave desert.
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 5, 2011 23:52:17 GMT 1
Stephen Hawking backs possibility for humans to travel millions of years into the future Stephen Hawking has claimed that humans might one day be able to use time travel to skip generations into the future. The famous astrophysicist, speaking in a new documentary, said spaceships could one day be capable of such high speeds that time slowed down for those on board. He admitted he had avoided talking about time travel previously ' for fear of being labelled a crank', saying the subject had once been 'scientific heresy'. 'These days I'm not so cautious,' he said. Theoretically, such a space ship would allow the crew to repopulate the earth if they found our species had become extinct during their flight. Stephen Hawking's Universe, in which he makes the comments, will be screened on Discovery next Sunday. In another part of the series he says alien life is likely to exist but that humans should avoid making contact. Hawking said a spaceship capable of travelling through time - but only forwards - would breach Albert Einstein's theories of relativity. Having taken six years to reach its full speed of 98 per cent of the speed of light (650million miles per hour), a day on board the ship would be equivalent to a year on Earth, he said, allowing those on board to reach the edge of the galaxy in just 80 years. But the ship required for the journey would have to be massive to allow for the required fuel. He dismissed the idea of travelling backwards through time, saying doing so would violate a fundamental rule that cause comes before effect and that such an act could allow people to make themselves impossible, such as if a person travelled back in time and shot thir former self. While backing Hawking's theories, Brian Cox, a Manchester University professor and the presenter of BBC's Wonders of the Solar System, admitted there were significant impediments to realising them. 'We can already see how time slows down for objects travelling at high speed by looking at what happens in paricle accelerators,' he told The Times. 'When we accelerate tiny particles to 99.99 per cent of the sped of light in the Large Hadron Collider at Cern in Geneva, the time they experience passes at one-seventhousandth of the rate it does for us. 'If we could build a spaceship that was fast enough, then it could reach other stars in the lifetime of the crew, but maybe 2.5million years would have passed by on earth.' Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1270531/Stephen-Hawking-backs-possibility-time-travel-millions-years-future.html#ixzz1ACiZdq6C
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 6, 2011 0:06:23 GMT 1
Stephen William Hawking, CH, CBE, FRS, FRSA (born 8 January 1942) is a British theoretical physicist and cosmologist, whose scientific career spans over forty years. His books and public appearances have made him an academic celebrity and he is an Honorary Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts, a lifetime member of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, and in 2009 was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the highest civilian award in the United States. Hawking was the Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at the University of Cambridge for thirty years, taking up the post in 1979 and retiring on 1 October 2009. He is also a Fellow of Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge and a Distinguished Research Chair at the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Waterloo, Ontario. He is known for his contributions to the fields of cosmology and quantum gravity, especially in the context of black holes. He has also achieved success with works of popular science in which he discusses his own theories and cosmology in general; these include the runaway best seller A Brief History of Time, which stayed on the British Sunday Times bestsellers list for a record-breaking 237 weeks. Hawking's key scientific works to date have included providing, with Roger Penrose, theorems regarding gravitational singularities in the framework of general relativity, and the theoretical prediction that black holes should emit radiation, which is today known as Hawking radiation (or sometimes as Bekenstein--Hawking radiation). Hawking has a neuro-muscular dystrophy that is related to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, a condition that has progressed over the years and has left him almost completely paralysed. www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-pANOSx4Uc&feature=relatedwww.youtube.com/watch?v=Qw2BPFHQtt8&feature=relatedwww.youtube.com/watch?v=NflI8K0ujMU&feature=relatedwww.youtube.com/watch?v=5zVQc_bQSng&feature=relatedwww.youtube.com/watch?v=lHrd_OJEExE&feature=related
|
|
|
Post by meldrew on Jan 6, 2011 0:14:53 GMT 1
I stand corrected, but he did mention wormholes I'm sure of that, the one thing I have noticed in the short space of time that I've been looking at this is, in jim pennistons hypnotic regression tapes, he says they can only travel backwards in time, where as Anderson and as you say Hawkins say its the other way round, only forward time travel is possible, one thing for sure is the amount of power needed to achieve any sort of time travel is immense.I have to correct myself Anderson says you could travel back and forwards in time.
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 6, 2011 0:20:46 GMT 1
I stand corrected, but he did mention wormholes I'm sure of that, the one thing I have noticed in the short space of time that I've been looking at this is, in jim pennistons hypnotic regression tapes, he says they can only travel backwards in time, where as Anderson and as you say Hawkins say its the other way round, only forward time travel is possible, one thing for sure is the amount of power needed to achieve any sort of time travel is immense. Yes he's also talked about worm holes as has many other's too m8 Michio Kaku being one of them
|
|
|
Post by meldrew on Jan 6, 2011 20:53:27 GMT 1
I am considering contacting Dr David Anderson, as this subject is a bit heavy and some questions could be answered, I have it that he is very approachable and welcomes correspondence, so if anyone has a query regarding time travel then put it on here
|
|
|
Post by simplyerik on Feb 28, 2011 22:28:23 GMT 1
I would hope going backwards in time never gets any research, only forward in time. Mainly because the ability to go backward in time would most likely end up in the wrong hands (A government knowing how every war can be won.)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2011 3:11:01 GMT 1
Hello All,
I could be oversimplifying things a bit but it would seem that one travels back in time only mentally and travels forward in time only physically. I've been involved in many "time" discussions on astronomy Forums and it is always interesting to see different viewpoints. One thing that I've never seen discussed is the idea that travelling faster will get one "there" sooner. But would an earlier presence cause an imbalance of some kind? More importantly though, If one arrives at a point where an object is does one get embedded, or suddenly after arriving get swept away on some body in it's orbit?
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Mar 10, 2011 3:24:22 GMT 1
Hello All, I could be oversimplifying things a bit but it would seem that one travels back in time only mentally and travels forward in time only physically. I've been involved in many "time" discussions on astronomy Forums and it is always interesting to see different viewpoints. One thing that I've never seen discussed is the idea that travelling faster will get one "there" sooner. But would an earlier presence cause an imbalance of some kind? More importantly though, If one arrives at a point where an object is does one get embedded, or suddenly after arriving get swept away on some body in it's orbit? From what i can gather from Stephen Hawkings is that say you are travelling at around the speed of light, time for you on the craft would be much slower than time for people back on earth. Here's what Stephen Hawking's says, Quote: Having taken six years to reach its full speed of 98 per cent of the speed of light (650million miles per hour), a day on board the ship would be equivalent to a year on Earth, he said, allowing those on board to reach the edge of the galaxy in just 80 years. |
Stephen Hawking's Documentary in this thread will give you a good idea on Time Travel I dont think its possible to travel back in time, i could be wrong tho.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2011 3:48:24 GMT 1
Hello uforn,
You are correct but more accurately stated the time on your craft relative to you will be the same. Your clock will only appear slower to an observer back on Earth. That's why it's called the Theory of Relativity
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Mar 10, 2011 4:03:33 GMT 1
Hello uforn, You are correct but more accurately stated the time on your craft relative to you will be the same. Your clock will only appear slower to an observer back on Earth. That's why it's called the Theory of Relativity Yes time for you on the craft would stay the same but to someone on earth time would pass much more quickly.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2011 4:20:44 GMT 1
Hello uforn,
Relativity can be somewhat troublesome in it's simplicity. The time on earth would be the same relative to someone on Earth as well. I think what you are getting at is that if the two clocks- the one on Earth and the one one on the craft- could meet up then one would see that the one on the craft would display a loss of time relative to the clock on Earth
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Mar 10, 2011 4:27:51 GMT 1
Hello uforn, Relativity can be somewhat troublesome in it's simplicity. The time on earth would be the same relative to someone on Earth as well. I think what you are getting at is that if the two clocks- the one on Earth and the one one on the craft- could meet up then one would see that the one on the craft would display a loss of time. Yes it is very complicated and hard to get your head around, even scientists have trouble working it all out
|
|