|
Post by meldrew on Jul 31, 2012 10:17:53 GMT 1
RENDLESHAM-INCIDENT.CO.UK
The domain rendlesham-incident.co.uk may be for sale by its owner! price £199 english pounds since Linda Moulton-Howe got involved with sgt Jim Peniston the whole Rendlesham saga has lost its appeal, whats 199 in binary code lol
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jul 31, 2012 14:10:29 GMT 1
I wouldnt put all the blame on Linda I think it was Jim that done all the damage. Why didnt he tell us of this binary 30 years ago? The binary for 199 is 11000111
|
|
|
Post by chrisperridas on Aug 1, 2012 2:33:57 GMT 1
I don't think I follow - binary? Can you elaborate?
|
|
|
Post by meldrew on Aug 1, 2012 10:01:05 GMT 1
I don't think I follow - binary? Can you elaborate? theres a binary thread in the announcements section with the whole story, binary numbers telepathically planted into sgt Jim Penniston during the Rendlesham incident were made public after 30 years of being hidden under a bed,
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Aug 1, 2012 12:42:28 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by meldrew on Aug 1, 2012 20:53:46 GMT 1
Rendlesham incident forum has slightly altered its name and merged with Bentwaters 1980 forum, Ian Ridpath goes there and still maintains it was the light house, one thread started by admin is titled "Is The Rendlesham Forest Incident Dead" and Jim Penniston and Linda Moulton-howe get the blame ;D is this thread turning into an On Topic thread lol
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Aug 4, 2012 12:49:09 GMT 1
Rendlesham incident forum has slightly altered its name and merged with Bentwaters 1980 forum, Ian Ridpath goes there and still maintains it was the light house, one thread started by admin is titled "Is The Rendlesham Forest Incident Dead" and Jim Penniston and Linda Moulton-howe get the blame ;D is this thread turning into an On Topic thread lol I wouldnt say it is dead as there will still be some researchers continuing with their research on this case. Well we all know Ian Ridpath is right to a certain extent, because they did see the lighthouse, but there was also the claimed UFO. And the lighthouse theory does not explain the UFO sightings before and around the time of the Incident.
|
|
|
Post by meldrew on Aug 4, 2012 15:00:43 GMT 1
Rendlesham incident forum has slightly altered its name and merged with Bentwaters 1980 forum, Ian Ridpath goes there and still maintains it was the light house, one thread started by admin is titled "Is The Rendlesham Forest Incident Dead" and Jim Penniston and Linda Moulton-howe get the blame ;D is this thread turning into an On Topic thread lol I wouldnt say it is dead as there will still be some researchers continuing with their research on this case. Well we all know Ian Ridpath is right to a certain extent, because they did see the lighthouse, but there was also the claimed UFO. And the lighthouse theory does not explain the UFO sightings before and around the time of the Incident. you may think that but I lived out that way for 2 years and never did I see the light house beam, I never did see a UFO either.
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Aug 4, 2012 15:05:54 GMT 1
I wouldnt say it is dead as there will still be some researchers continuing with their research on this case. Well we all know Ian Ridpath is right to a certain extent, because they did see the lighthouse, but there was also the claimed UFO. And the lighthouse theory does not explain the UFO sightings before and around the time of the Incident. you may think that but I lived out that way for 2 years and never did I see the light house beam, I never did see a UFO either. Did you go out to the area in the woods where it happened mate ?
|
|
|
Post by meldrew on Aug 4, 2012 16:52:42 GMT 1
I see where your going with this line of questioning well the main thing is this, the great storm of 86 decimated the landscape so unless I had been to the exact spot before 86 my evidence is moot, but where I lived (2 different locations) and worked out there (known locally as the peninsular) I lived nearer to Orford than where the landing area is and the landscape was open farm land, and I never saw the light house beam, in a court of law my evidence would fail, but my bones say no way was it a light house beam
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Aug 6, 2012 14:20:18 GMT 1
I see where your going with this line of questioning well the main thing is this, the great storm of 86 decimated the landscape so unless I had been to the exact spot before 86 my evidence is moot, but where I lived (2 different locations) and worked out there (known locally as the peninsular) I lived nearer to Orford than where the landing area is and the landscape was open farm land, and I never saw the light house beam, in a court of law my evidence would fail, but my bones say no way was it a light house beam Yeah without actually going out there, whether before 86 or after, it would be impossible to say whether you could see the lighthouse or not
|
|