uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jul 7, 2010 3:31:03 GMT 1
|
|
Laurance
Member Of Distiction
Gold Star Award For Contribution To The Forum
Posts: 220
|
Post by Laurance on Jul 7, 2010 18:39:19 GMT 1
It was revealed in a new article that Romanek Polygraph Test was made public. The examiner found deception in his answers. Romanek responded in a letter that because of his health issues such as PTSD (which causes various physical effects) polygraph testing is not accurate on him, and he stands by his claims.
It is amazing he never said this before the Test or at any other time. He just wanted money.
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jul 7, 2010 18:47:18 GMT 1
Anyone that want money from ufo / alien footage to me is a Hoax.....
Stan wanted $50'000 for his footage to me this rings alarm bells straight away.....
|
|
Laurance
Member Of Distiction
Gold Star Award For Contribution To The Forum
Posts: 220
|
Post by Laurance on Jul 7, 2010 18:53:14 GMT 1
This is the Coast to Coast recording for the test.
I think it is a hoax, nothing but him trying to make money of the ega.
|
|
|
Post by sddwashington on Feb 4, 2013 9:22:48 GMT 1
Well I am not impressed. The YouTube above is no longer attainable. I did see it frame by frame and I said Hoax before I did the framing. I tell you mates, with all this new age stuff and Computer Generated Imagery people are just wasting there. I mean us Researchers. I get very impatient with the reports handed to me here.
|
|
Aelius
Researcher
Deep Thought.
Posts: 178
|
Post by Aelius on Feb 23, 2013 11:55:13 GMT 1
Well I am not impressed. The YouTube above is no longer attainable. I did see it frame by frame and I said Hoax before I did the framing. I tell you mates, with all this new age stuff and Computer Generated Imagery people are just wasting there. I mean us Researchers. I get very impatient with the reports handed to me here. This is why you have me. I can discern CGI from reality.
|
|
Tommy
Administrator
Posts: 92
|
Post by Tommy on Feb 23, 2013 13:58:14 GMT 1
Well I am not impressed. The YouTube above is no longer attainable. I did see it frame by frame and I said Hoax before I did the framing. I tell you mates, with all this new age stuff and Computer Generated Imagery people are just wasting there. I mean us Researchers. I get very impatient with the reports handed to me here. This is why you have me. I can discern CGI from reality. Your not alone there Aelius
|
|
Aelius
Researcher
Deep Thought.
Posts: 178
|
Post by Aelius on Feb 23, 2013 18:12:26 GMT 1
The more, the merrier.
|
|
|
Post by sddwashington on Feb 24, 2013 5:12:59 GMT 1
Well Mates I am in the American East coast now for 4 weeks. I will embed that Bob Lazar Area 51 flying disc as soon as I get some sleep. What thread should I put it in? I guess just right here?
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Feb 27, 2013 18:55:24 GMT 1
Well Mates I am in the American East coast now for 4 weeks. I will embed that Bob Lazar Area 51 flying disc as soon as I get some sleep. What thread should I put it in? I guess just right here? Whats Bob Lazar got to do with Stan Romanek sddwashington ?
|
|
|
Post by sddwashington on Feb 27, 2013 19:57:00 GMT 1
On that Lazar thread there was a download that I watched and there was an alleged UFO there that was a 15 second clip. I do not know of Lazar took the shot or what. Is was supposed to be at Area 51. It was very plain to me it was a CGI. I am on a IPhone writing this and you can see this clip on your site. That is where I downloaded it from UFORN. Let me know Tommy what you think.
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Feb 27, 2013 20:41:43 GMT 1
On that Lazar thread there was a download that I watched and there was an alleged UFO there that was a 15 second clip. I do not know of Lazar took the shot or what. Is was supposed to be at Area 51. It was very plain to me it was a CGI. I am on a IPhone writing this and you can see this clip on your site. That is where I downloaded it from UFORN. Let me know Tommy what you think. THis thread is about Stan Romanek not Bob Lazar, if you want to Talk about Bob Lazar create a new thread
|
|
|
Post by sddwashington on Feb 27, 2013 21:09:44 GMT 1
I understand that. But the thread on Stan I said was CGI and I was comparing it to the Lazar CGI clip. That was all Tommy. I am sorry. I should have made myself more clearer. It is hard to answer posts on Mobile Phones. Aelius said to me about the Stan clip about it being CGI as I said the same thing. This is off subject but I watched the Apollo moon clips fr here last night again. I will PM you as I have Deleted your contact info you sent me. Thought we would have a fireside chat mate. No Worries all Good.
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Mar 3, 2013 18:13:56 GMT 1
I understand that. But the thread on Stan I said was CGI and I was comparing it to the Lazar CGI clip. Stans footage could easily be just a puppet, and I dont see how you can compare footage of a light in the sky to an alien popping up at a window. Ive seen you mention Bob Lazars footage as being CGI a few times now, so go ahead and prove to me that the footage which was took in 1989 is CGI
|
|
|
Post by sddwashington on Mar 4, 2013 8:52:06 GMT 1
Well mate, G'Day from Freezing North America. The Lazar UFO Clip of it taking off at Area 51 looks very CGI. It is something out of Pixar world when that technology was just being developed. I Mean Tommy that is the way it looks to me. The Stan clip as I saw it again and again may not be a CGI clip. I think I am confusing that Stan shot with something else. You are right about one thing. I can not prove that the Lazar clip is legitimate nor can you tell me what is in Stan,s clip. This is why I am going back to older cases before this vast technological leap in camera and advanced CGI took place. I am doing a study now about the UFO,s over Washington D.C. In 1952. They are more intriguing to me and the Military is very involved. Speaking of which has there ever been sightings I downtown London. Aelius tells me He is good with CGI. Ask Him about Lazar and what He thinks. That UFO looks close to the movie "Earth vs the Flying Saucers".
|
|
|
Post by sddwashington on Mar 4, 2013 8:58:42 GMT 1
All I forgot to say this. Bob Lazar does not interest me as some others do. You said If I was interested on Lazar then start a thread on Him. The stuff that precedes him is what I am looking at.
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Mar 4, 2013 16:35:42 GMT 1
Well mate, G'Day from Freezing North America. The Lazar UFO Clip of it taking off at Area 51 looks very CGI. It is something out of Pixar world when that technology was just being developed. I Mean Tommy that is the way it looks to me. The Stan clip as I saw it again and again may not be a CGI clip. I think I am confusing that Stan shot with something else. You are right about one thing. I can not prove that the Lazar clip is legitimate nor can you tell me what is in Stan,s clip. This is why I am going back to older cases before this vast technological leap in camera and advanced CGI took place. I am doing a study now about the UFO,s over Washington D.C. In 1952. They are more intriguing to me and the Military is very involved. Speaking of which has there ever been sightings I downtown London. Aelius tells me He is good with CGI. Ask Him about Lazar and what He thinks. That UFO looks close to the movie "Earth vs the Flying Saucers". The clip of e UFO taking off at Area 51 IS CGI it was a demonstration to his testimony that he witnessed a UFO take off. I thought you were talking about the footage that was took out in the desert.
|
|
|
Post by sddwashington on Mar 4, 2013 19:14:48 GMT 1
Spot on Tommy!!!! it does get somewhat confusing on this subject. Good on you. So we got the right one! Well I am still reading all of the posts as I get time. I guess I will start something of interest that is our subject material but with a different flare. Thanks again Tommy.
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Mar 4, 2013 19:22:15 GMT 1
No probs, but just to set the record straight that UFO taking off wasnt done by Bob Lazar it was done by the producer's of the documentary, the footage that was shown out in the desert was done by Lazar and is genuine.
|
|