coco
Researcher
Posts: 153
|
Post by coco on May 29, 2010 22:16:11 GMT 1
Hmm, I personally believe that life exists on alternative frequencies (for my own reasons), and I include ET life in that.
If the hotelier has made previous claims of 'ghostly' activities, maybe other CCTV films could be examined with less inclement weather threatening better observation. I cannot conclude what I see. Perhaps the humidity and moisture are playing a trick of the light.
|
|
coco
Researcher
Posts: 153
|
Post by coco on May 29, 2010 22:04:25 GMT 1
Hello Tinyint, and thank you for 'test driving' the forum.
|
|
coco
Researcher
Posts: 153
|
Post by coco on May 28, 2010 17:39:17 GMT 1
Nazi UFO theory? That book is next on my list! I don't know why I'm so fascinated by that subject. Perhaps it's because it happened so far back in history when it's commonly assumed we (humans) were not so technologically advanced.
Some people were still using oxes and mules to pull wagons back then, a lot of people still did not have the telephone in their home, and yet some scientists were working on projects that pushed the envelope of imagination and real science.
|
|
coco
Researcher
Posts: 153
|
Post by coco on May 28, 2010 17:24:34 GMT 1
While I'm not familiar with the book I have read the reviews and they are stellar. Might have to pick up a copy for myself.
|
|
coco
Researcher
Posts: 153
|
Post by coco on May 28, 2010 17:20:04 GMT 1
I've seen this interview. He covers a wealth of material in a quick, matter of fact pace confirming for me back engineeering and use of past Nazi technologies - that could well have been back engineered as well.
|
|
coco
Researcher
Posts: 153
|
Post by coco on May 28, 2010 17:01:34 GMT 1
Hello Agent Mulder, the discerning and thoughtful mind you possess. A much appreciated thought process.
|
|
coco
Researcher
Posts: 153
|
Post by coco on May 28, 2010 16:59:19 GMT 1
Hi Weeme! Yes, it's me, the same Coco from the other board. I'm glad you're here as you are a good poster. We will not roll our eyes at you or anyone else if you promise not to roll your eyes at me.
|
|
coco
Researcher
Posts: 153
|
Post by coco on May 28, 2010 1:54:15 GMT 1
|
|
coco
Researcher
Posts: 153
|
Post by coco on May 27, 2010 19:24:00 GMT 1
This is shame. Good scientists holding society's betterment in their hearts and minds, who volunteer their efforts, not belonging to a corporatacracy, being shut down, threatened.
It is rumored that upon Tesla's death, US government authorities gathered his papers and transported them to ??
While some of Tesla's ideas and inventions were deemed without useful merit at the time, I believe over the years useful merit has been and continues to be found.
There is too much at stake for oil companies to risk alternative energy to take hold and apparently there are too many people 'high up' with vested interests to permit it.
|
|
coco
Researcher
Posts: 153
|
Post by coco on May 27, 2010 19:05:11 GMT 1
Bill Nye behaved as an arrogant jerk on Larry King. There's a way to present your opposing thoughts and Nye didn't employ it at all. He was so condescending.
|
|
coco
Researcher
Posts: 153
|
Post by coco on May 27, 2010 18:59:15 GMT 1
Good luck with your studies, gentlemen! For those residing in the US, MUFON offers investigator courses: www.mufon.com/how-to-become-a-ufo-field-investigator.htm4 Steps to becoming a MUFON Field Investigator Step 1: If you have not already done so, please join MUFON at www.mufon.com/joinnow.htm or renew your membership at www.mufon.com/renewnow.htm. Only current members in good standing (current membership dues paid) can be promoted to MUFON Field Investigator status. Step 2: Purchase a copy of the MUFON Field Investigator’s manual at the MUFON Store. To ensure that only competent investigators conduct witness interviews, on-site investigations, and collateral contacts with public agencies and others, formal Field Investigator training is essential. The MUFON Field Investigator’s Manual is the basic reference for training. All trainees must possess an original copy of the Manual and become completely familiar with its contents. Step 3: Self study the MUFON Field Investigator Manual or attend a training class conducted by your local chapter (if available). You can find your local chapter at www.mufon.com/statedir.htm by clicking on your state. Then complete the open book MUFON Field Investigator’s exam, a copy of which is included in the Field Investigator’s manual. Send your completed exam for grading to the address listed on the exam. Also, please make sure you either email a professional portrait photo of yourself (.jpg format 448H X 336W pixels at 300dpi) to hq@mufon.com or by mail to MUFON, PO Box 279, Bellvue, CO 80512. Please include your name and MUFON ID #. In order to be promoted to the position of Field Investigator, every member must achieve a favorable score on the MUFON Field Investigator’s Exam (passing overall score of at least 80%). The purpose of administering the exam is to evaluate the individual’s practical knowledge in respect to both potential UFO and IFO (identifiable flying object) reports from the public. The exam consists of one-hundred questions in twelve specific areas: light and optics; sound; electromagnetic properties; measurements; physical traces; photography; radio and radar; celestial objects; atmosphere and weather; conventional vehicles; witness reactions; and the recent history of UFO experiences. Before engaging in actual investigation stemming from a UFO report, the Field Investigator Trainee needs a thorough grounding in the following areas: • Investigative Ethics. Most importantly, the Trainee must understand and adhere to the tenet of anonymity (withholding witness identifiers from persons who are not part of the UFO report investigation or its evaluation within MUFON). • Interviewing Methods. Preparation, controlling the setting, the sequence of obtaining a complete account, recognizing sensory perceptions, analyzing witness body language, active listening, interpreting the oral account, and drawing conclusions are all vitally important. • Collateral Contacts. In a given circumstance, the Trainee must be aware of which public officials and/or others to contact in order to potentially resolve the report as a misperception, determine the person’s reliability as a witness, or identify others who may have witnessed and reported the same event. • Technical Background. A working knowledge should be conveyed to the Trainee on the subjects of weather anomalies, astronomy, conventional aircraft (especially lighting configurations), space satellites, photographic equipment and methods, and the soil sciences. Step 4: Although it is not required, it is highly recommended that once you pass your exam and achieve Field Investigator status that you accompany a current experienced MUFON Field Investigator on one or more live investigations before attempting an investigation on your own. Please contact your MUFON State Director to coordinate mentoring opportunities. You can find your State Director’s contact information at www.mufon.com/statedir.htm (click on your state).
|
|
coco
Researcher
Posts: 153
|
Post by coco on May 27, 2010 18:51:22 GMT 1
Outstanding! If that was actual, rather than some sort of photographic trickery, then what a great catch.
My gosh, the way that thing just zipped straight up from a perfectly stationary position. And the spheres that were orbiting it disappeared as well.
One can only imagine that perhaps the spheres were data collecting devices feeding information to the main craft?
|
|
coco
Researcher
Posts: 153
|
Post by coco on May 27, 2010 18:40:24 GMT 1
Hmm, this article reminds me of the Nuremburg sighting well back in history, eyewitnesses claimed they saw illuminated balls flying in the sky and flying crosses. The flying crosses resemble winged airplanes to me, and the lighted balls of the foo fighters. Witness accounts state the crafts were involved in a battle, however, unlike the foo fighters and war planes. The Nuremburg witnesses also claimed they saw cylindrical flying objects. Hans Glaser's wood cutting depicting the 16th century spectacle.
|
|
coco
Researcher
Posts: 153
|
Post by coco on May 26, 2010 22:01:35 GMT 1
www.ufodigest.com/morningstar/loader.htmlThe 1932 Sutton UFO Photo by Robert Morningstar Flash presentation of the Sutton UFO photo: www.ufodigest.com/morningstar/ufoSlides.swfOne a spring day around noon, May 1932, this photo was taken of Mr. George Sutton near St. Paris, Ohio. When developed, the photo showed an unusual object in the sky behind Mr. Sutton. However, the true significance of the object would not be recognized until the late 1940s when The Age of Flying Saucers began in earnest. There are no power poles or power lines visible anywhere in this picture. The owner of the photo album stated there were no street lights along this road in those days. Therefore, the UFO in this photo could not have been a street lamp, simply because there were no street lamps there at the time. This picture, showing a vintage automobile with a 1932 license plate on the front bumper, was taken near mid-day (as may be seen from the shadows on the ground). To date, no one has been able to account for the dark object seen over Mr. Sutton's left shoulder in this photograph. End
|
|
coco
Researcher
Posts: 153
|
Post by coco on May 26, 2010 17:15:49 GMT 1
"Not only is the craft silent, but also it is often reported that the very atmosphere is changed and that no sounds at all are heard, including the rustling of trees around the witnesses even though the wind is blowing. Extreme Low Frequency (ELF) vibrations emanating from a Black Triangle may be dampening or suppressing the propagation of sound waves normally through the atmosphere. ELF waves effects could also explain some of the unusual somatic sensations of witnesses beneath the craft (including paralysis, sometimes panic, other times calm, serenity in awe), as well as, a sense of time dilation occurring during the sighting event. The use of such ELF frequencies by the U.S. Navy may have resulted in the mass beaching of whales and dolphins and the migration of sharks closer to the shores of North America where such "towed sonar arrays" were used."
When a known, undeniable Stealth fighter passed over me (while I was outside in my yard in Plant City, Florida) at a very low altitude - 5-7 stories up - I heard what I'll describe as the sound of an 18 wheeler well in the distance - even when the craft was directly above my head.
Yes, I would also call it a hum. As I was in the transportation industry when I lived in Florida, I guess that's why I relate the sound to a truck in the distance.
I watched it journey on and after I could no longer see it did I realize the jet's noise did not hurt my ears. I never covered my ears. No neighborhood dogs barked or appeared excited/disturbed.
There were two great oaks in that yard. I can't say that I paid any attention as to whether they were disturbed by the fly over or not, but I can say there was no dramatic whooshing of the branches and leaves to capture my attention.
|
|
coco
Researcher
Posts: 153
|
Post by coco on May 26, 2010 16:25:51 GMT 1
www.ufodigest.com/news/1107/ufoconference16.htmlAddendum: Historic Italian News Coverage of Belgian Black Triangle UFO Incident Paraphrase of Italian Narration by Matteo Sarti & Robert Morningstar: "No one could really explain the nature of the flying object. It appeared somewhat like an airplane but the OVNI moved much faster in the sky than any airplane ever seen. The object was observed and tracked by 3 squads of Belgian Police and many Belgian and Dutch citizens on the ground. Two F36s of The Belgian Air Force were ordered to follow the mysterious object but they could not because the UFO accelerated from slow flight to over 2000 km/hr in just a few seconds. What would later be called "The Belgian Black Triangle" just flew too fast with incredible acceleration up into the sky for any jet plane to stay with it. The object disappeared in a few seconds with no visible trace, and exerting G-forces that no human could survive at that incredible velocity," which has been calculated as 5 times the limits of human tolerance." The latest incident of a UFO encounter with a NATO Member Air Force (Courtesy of Frank Warren) is given below: On October 4th, 2007, RAF interceptors were scrambled to chase 2 UFOs, seen over Felpham in the UK, was reported below in the Chichester Times: www.chichester.co.uk
|
|
coco
Researcher
Posts: 153
|
Post by coco on May 26, 2010 15:49:43 GMT 1
www.ufodigest.com/news/1107/ufoconference11.htmlBack to The Petit Rechain Flyover ("Oh, My God! Look at that!") In closing, permit me to speculate further and close this analysis by considering the photo taken over Petit Rechain on April 4th, 1990 by "Mr. P. M." Rarely have I been more surprised in photo analysis than I was today when I worked on this photo. Immediately after increasing gamma levels to lighten the photo, I sat stunned by what I saw… "What a dirty lens!" I thought at first glance. But when I enlarged the photo, I exclaimed: "Oh, My God! Look at that!" I thought it looked like "dirty lens" too until I looked more closely, in particular, at the upper left corner. That's when I saw Aladebaran and recognized the Constellation Taurus in the photo. I then noticed to the left of Taurus, 3 of the stars of the Constellation Orion, not the 3 "Belt Stars of Orion" but 3 lesser ones. The topmost one is called "Tabit," in the region of M 3. Star Chart Taurus: www.glyphweb.com/esky"A line pointing through the three stars of the Orion's Belt, out towards Taurus, guides the way to this orange star. Unlike most of Orion's prominent stars, binary Tabit is fairly close to the Sun: just 26 light years away." Star Chart Orion: www.glyphweb.comwww.chichester.co.ukThe reader may well ask at this point: "So what? Why is this important?" Well, first, it is possible to determine the exact location of the photographer on the night of April 4th, 1990 (if we can determine the time the photo was taken). Secondly, it will make it easier for the one to believe that if the photographer could capture the stars of Taurus and Orion that were out that night, one may be more inclined to consider the possibility that the photographer captured 2 other objects that were in the sky that night beside the Belgian Black Triangle. It is my hope that my analysis may in some way contribute to a better understanding of this historic "flap" in Belgium and influence the American government to proceed toward open UFO Disclosure. More facts may soon surface in Brussels with this certainty, which I feel, that the Truth still lives in Belgium.
|
|
coco
Researcher
Posts: 153
|
Post by coco on May 26, 2010 15:45:14 GMT 1
www.ufodigest.com/news/1107/ufoconference8.htmlNational Press Conference UFO Conference Report Part III Photo Enhancements, Analysis & Interpretation of The Belgian Black Triangle Photos (Submitted by various Belgian citizens) Artistic Illustration by Robert D. Morningstar (Copyright 2007, Robert D. Morningstar - All Rights Reserved) In support of General De Brouwer's call for investigation of the Belgian Black Triangle UFO, I am submitting the following photo enhancements, analysis and interpretation of the Belgian Black Triangle Photos (submitted by Belgian witnesses) who captured the UFO craft on film. The analyst is grateful to the Belgian people for freely sharing their photos with the world in the hope of solving the mystery of the strange aerial intruder and its origin. I hope that my enhancements will compel others to pursue this investigation to resolve this paradox. I would like to thank Mr. J. S. Henradi of Wallonia for sharing his remarkable photo, and especially, the anonymous, "Mr. P.M.," photographer, of the Petit-Rechain Flyover of April 1990. This first photo above has no date/time/year (DTY) information as depicted on the National UFO Center website. I look forward to finding the DTY in future. I enhanced this photo by modifying gamma levels, reducing brightness, removing "noise" and increasing sharpness. Further, the modification of contrast resulted in the details, which I had not previously discerned. What appears to be a tail structure has emerged, indicating to this analyst, the possibility of a variable angle tail, which may indicate that the entire craft itself may be able to change shape. A variable sweep Delta wing has long been an "engineer's dream." If the apparent structure is a tail, there is a suggestion of a vertical structure (reminiscent of an F35 or some models of MIG aircraft). Triangular craft in America have been seen to deploy and recover smaller craft, often red in color, which may be due to a low energy state necessary for slow flight. The high-speed modes of UFOs are often reported to be in the amber, white and ultra-blue light frequencies and UFOs are often seen to cycle through color changes during different flight regimens. At other times, they have been seen to go through rapid color changes so fast that they all appear to be present simultaneously, as was reported by General Parviz Jafari during his Iranian encounter in 1976. This analyst noted that while in that color cycle mode, F-4 pilot, Jafari, could not discern the shape of the craft, which later deployed to other smaller craft, which approached his F-4 before rejoining with the "carrier ship" before it landed near the Erbuz Mountains. An interesting feature, an external "cell" of some sort appears attached to the fuselage on the port side of the craft. This could be one of many things. It could be a "blister", an observation window (a la Catalina Flying Boats) or it could be a light. There is a suggestion to be seen in this photo that the "blister" is symmetrical in the structure of the fuselage. In the photo enhancement below, only the port side "cell" has been delineated with an arrowhead (in order to facilitate the study of the starboard side for those who wish to do so. An intriguing possibility is that we may be looking at some sort of deployable scout craft. For Original Photo: In the enhancement below, I have reversed the colors "Red for Blue" in order to bring out the entire contour of the Black Triangle's Delta plan form. This enhancement more clearly delineates the previously mentioned "cell" or "blister". But furthermore, there is an indication of the presence of second nearly identical structure next to the first one noted on the same port side. This "RxB photo" also shows an air gap between the tail structure and the trailing edge of the Delta wing, reminding the analyst of the tail structure of American Space Shuttles, leading me to think "Similar structure, similar purpose." The Petit Rechain Flyover April 4th, 1990 An unidentified photographer (as many other Belgians did) released a photo, which was taken over Petit Rechain, Belgium on April 4th, 1990. Below is the original photo. I have studied this photo since 1992 but it only the right side of it in a cropped photo. I recently that I discovered the entire frame posted on the Internet. This photo has provided one of the most pleasant surprises, which I will save for last. Here is the story behind the photo as reported by Mark Cashman Source: Mark Cashman (temporaldoorway.com) Original Source "Mr. P. M. is a young worker (turner). The photo was allegedly made at the beginning of April 1990 (4 or 7 probably). The photographer's girl friend saw the object and gave him notice. He had a roll nearly finished in his apparatus and made the two last (numbers 35 and 36). Then he sent the roll to a lab, which was offering cheap prices. When the roll came back, only 35 was good, there was practically nothing on 36. P. M. showed the 2 photos to several people working with him (they have been found back and have confirmed), and then threw away number 36. One of his colleagues, Mr. L. R., spoke to a press photograph, who bought the copyright (Mr. L. R. and other colleagues have confirmed this part of the story). Then the photo appeared in the press (a couple of months after it had been made)." [footnote 1] Kodak 200 ASA film, Praktika BX20 with Cokin 1A skylight filter on zoom setting, exposure 2 seconds at f4." One of the most admirable characteristics of the Belgian people that I discerned during this study was their generosity and readiness to share their photos with the government and the public, unlike so many in America who seek profit before progress in the investigation of UFOs. One such person, who chose not to remain anonymous is Mr. J. S. Henrardi, a resident of Wallonia. Here is Mr. Henrardi's photo, which he took on June 15th, 1990. I have rendered an enhancement of details in this photo, centering the craft and, using the same methods described above have enlarged and sharpened the photo to reveal new details of wing structure, including the bevel of the leading edges, giving us an idea of the thickness of the wing, suggests similarities to Stealth Aircraft of the U.S. Air Force, most notably, the B-2 "Spirit." Though the craft has been described as silent, many observers of Black Triangles around the world there is sometimes a low hum. Some witnesses in America have noted that the edges of this craft often appear nebulous or "fuzzy" around the edges, especially to those who have found themselves directly under it. Not only is the craft silent, but also it is often reported that the very atmosphere is changed and that no sounds at all are heard, including the rustling of trees around the witnesses even though the wind is blowing. Extreme Low Frequency (ELF) vibrations emanating from a Black Triangle may be dampening or suppressing the propagation of sound waves normally through the atmosphere. ELF waves effects could also explain some of the unusual somatic sensations of witnesses beneath the craft (including paralysis, sometimes panic, other times calm, serenity in awe), as well as, a sense of time dilation occurring during the sighting event. The use of such ELF frequencies by the U.S. Navy may have resulted in the mass beaching of whales and dolphins and the migration of sharks closer to the shores of North America where such "towed sonar arrays" were used. The clarity and detail of the port wing light in contrast with the assumed "fuzziness" of the leading and tail edges may indicate that this craft "vibrates" through the atmosphere to achieve its remarkable performance. A vibrating wing form coupled with stealth technology could confer "electronic invisibility" to such a craft far beyond that of the B-2 "Spirit" as such vibration would further serve to disrupt, dampen or dissipate radar (or even) light waves. While one might tempted to believe at first that the photo is out of focus. However, the enhancement below demonstrates that the photographer was quite steady as he shot the photo…a difficult task even under ordinary circumstances. One of the most obvious details is that the craft is NOT perfectly triangular. The chord of the wing ends is visible just above the topmost light. The port and starboard wings are cut off at the ends. One of the most obvious details is that the craft is NOT perfectly triangular. The chord of the wing ends is visible just above the topmost light. The port and starboard wings are cut off at the ends. If this is so, such rotary motion of the light source could be part of the flight control system and a maneuvering "mechanism" of this craft. The Black Triangle may maneuver, change direction, orientation and flight attitude by creating vortices of light plasma to achieve its flight performance and flight characteristics. Of course, all this is all hypothetical and pure speculation. But my definition of "speculation" is "What I see (specto) is what I say."
|
|
coco
Researcher
Posts: 153
|
Post by coco on May 26, 2010 15:23:02 GMT 1
www.ufodigest.com/news/1107/ufoconference6.htmlThe National Press Club Conference on UFOs: Part Two "Truth Still Lives in Belgium" The Black Triangle Flap 1989-1990 by Robert D. Morningstar (Copyright 2007, Robert D. Morningstar - All Rights Reserved) My name is Wilfried De Brouwer. I am a retired Major General of the Belgian Air Force and I was Chief (of) Operations in the Air Staff when an exceptional UFO wave took place over Belgium. Indeed, during the evening of 29 November 1989, in a small area in Eastern Belgium, approximately 140 UFO sightings were reported. Hundreds of people saw a majestic triangular craft with a span of approximately 120 feet, powerful beaming spot lights, moving very slowly without making any significant noise but, in several cases, accelerating to very high speeds. The following days and months, many more sightings would follow. The UFO wave would last more than one year during which a Belgian UFO organization conducted more than 650 investigations and recorded more than 400 hours of audio witness reports. On one occasion, a photograph revealed the triangular shape and four light beams of the object. Belgium had no official focal point for reporting UFO observations. Nevertheless, in my function of Chief Operations, I was confronted with numerous questions about the origin and nature of these craft. In the first instance, and in consultation with other NATO partners, I could confirm that no flights of stealth aircraft or any other experimental aircraft look place in the airspace of Belgium. In addition, the Civil Aviation Authorities confirmed that no flight plans had been introduced. This implied that the reported object(s) committed an infraction against the existing aviation rules. The Belgian Air Force tried to identify the alleged intruder(s) and, on three occasions, launched F-16 aircraft. On one occasion, two F-16 registered rapid changes in speed and altitude which were well outside of the performance envelope of existing aircraft. Petit Rechain, Belgium April 4th, 1990 (See Robert Morningstar's photo enhancement in Part Three) Nevertheless, the pilots could not establish visual contact and the investigation revealed that specific weather conditions may have caused electromagnetic interferences and false returns on the radar screens. The technical evidence was insufficient to conclude that abnormal air activities took place during that evening. In short, the Belgian UFO wave was exceptional and the Air Force could not identify the nature, origin and intentions of the reported phenomena.
|
|
coco
Researcher
Posts: 153
|
Post by coco on May 26, 2010 15:09:45 GMT 1
www.ufodigest.com/news/1107/ufoconference5.htmlThe National Press Club Conference on UFOs: Part One "The Tide is Turning" by Robert D. Morningstar (Copyright 2007, Robert D. Morningstar - All Rights Reserved) Comandante Huerta's full statement follows: "I am Oscar Santa Maria Huerta, official pilot of the Peruvian Air Force, currently retired. On April 11, 1980, at 7:15 in the morning, 1800 men were in formation at the Air Base of La Joya, Arequipa. They all observed a stationary object in the sky, which looked like a balloon, at about three miles distance, and approximately 1,800 feet altitude. It was luminous because it reflected the sun. My unit commander ordered me to takeoff in my Sukhoi 22 jet to shoot down the spherical object. It was in restricted airspace, without clearance, and we were concerned about espionage. I approached the object and strafed sixty-four 30 mm. shells at it. Some projectiles went towards the ground, and others hit the object fully, but they had no effect at all. The projectiles didn't bounce off; probably they were absorbed. The cone-shaped "wall of fire" that I sent out would normally obliterate anything in its path. The object then began to ascend, and move farther away from the base. When I was at about 36,000 ft., it made a sudden stop, forcing me to veer to the side since I was only 1500 feet away. I flew up higher to attack It from above, but just as I had locked on to the target and was ready to shoot, the object made a straight vertical climb evading the attack. Two more times, I had the object on target, when the object was stationary. Each time, it moved away at the very last minute, when I was just about to fire, always eluding my attack. I decided to climb at full thrust to get above the object, bit began to ascend almost parallel to my plane, and when I reached 63,000 ft., it stopped. At this point, I came within about 300 feet of the UFO. It was about 30 feet in diameter. It was an enameled, cream-colored dome, with a wide, circular, metallic base. It had no engines, no exhausts, no windows, no wings or antennae. It lacked all the typical aircraft components, with no visible propulsion system. It was at that moment that I realized that this was no spying device, but that it was a UFO, something totally unknown. I was almost out of fuel, so I couldn't attack or maneuver my plane, or make a high speed escape. I was afraid. I thought I might be finished. When I had calmed down, I radioed for another plane to come and have a look, trying to hide my fear. They said no, it's too high, just come back. I had to glide part way down due to lack of fuel, zigzagging to make my plane harder to hit, always with my eyes on the rearview mirrors, hoping it wouldn't chase me. It didn't. I spent 22 minutes maneuvering with this object. After I landed, the object remained stationary in the sky for two more hours, for everyone at the base to see. A US Department of Defense document titled 'UFO Sighted in Peru' described the incident, stating that the vehicle's origin remains unknown. It still gives me chills to think about it." After the conference, I told Commander Huerta that I envied his experience, his flight and the amazing things his eyes had seen. This conference was truly a historic event in the annals of UFO research. "Out of the Blue" producer, James Fox, and reporter, Leslie Kean, are to be highly commended for organizing this unique event in UFO history. The Tide of Truth is turning. From left to right: Rodrigo Bravo Garrido, Captain and Pilot for the Aviation Army of Chile, Dr. Anthony Choy, founder, OIFAA, Peruvian Air Force, and a "Man in Black," with Oscar Santa Maria Huerta, Commander, Peruvian Air Force (Ret.), Sukhoi S-22 Pilot in the La Joya UFO Incident.
|
|
coco
Researcher
Posts: 153
|
Post by coco on May 25, 2010 21:17:20 GMT 1
www.ufoevidence.org/Cases/CaseSubarticle.asp?ID=130On the morning of September 16, 1994, teachers and school officials at the Ariel School in Ruwa, Zimbabwe were amazed when the school's students, aged approximately 5 to 12 years old, reported that a flying object had landed on the school grounds. The teachers at the school were in a meeting, so the 62 children were basically unsupervised while in the schoolyard on morning recess. The only available adult seems to have been one of the mothers, who was operating the school tuck shop - a sort of snack bar where candy, snacks and sodas are sold. According to some sources, UFOs had been seen in the skies over Zimbabwe for two days before the incident occurred. Ruwa is about 20 kilometers from Harare, the capitol of Zimbabwe. Ariel School is a private elementary school with students of mixed ethnic heritage. The children said that they had first seen three objects in the sky. These objects would disappear and then reappear in a different location. The objects moved closer and closer to the ground and finally landed in a brushy area adjacent to the schoolyard. This area had not been fully cleared yet and was off-limits to the students. The object landed, or hovered just above the ground, in an area about 100 meters from the students. The children said that a small man, about one meter in height, appeared on top of the object. The little man, who was described as having a scrawny neck, long black hair, and huge eyes, walked a short way across the ground toward the students. When he noticed the children, he vanished and then reappeared at the back of the object. The object then took off and vanished. The smaller children were very frightened and cried for help. They believed that the little man was a demon who would eat them. Black African children have heard legends of tokoloshis, demons who eat children. The children ran to the tuck shop operator, but she did not want to leave the shop unattended and so did not go. The late Cynthia Hind, known as Africa's foremost UFO investigator, investigated the case the next day. When she was first contacted, she asked the headmaster of the school, Colin Mackie, to have the children draw pictures of what they had seen. When she arrived at the school, he had about 35 drawings for her. The drawings were of very similar objects. 'I swear by every hair on my head and the whole Bible that I am telling the truth.' The headmaster affirmed that he believed that the students were telling the truth, and one little girl told Cynthia Hind that, 'I swear by every hair on my head and the whole Bible that I am telling the truth.' Dr. John Mack, the abduction researcher, and his associate Dominique Callimanopulos went to Ruwa and spent two days interviewing and counseling twelve of the children and their parents. "Those thoughts came from the man - the man's eyes." Curiously, the older students said that they felt that the creatures communicated with them somehow, sending the message that we humans are destroying our planet, polluting the environment in ways that will have dire consequences. The Sightings TV show did a report on the Ariel School landing, and CSETI has a RealPlayer video taken from the TV program with actual testimony from the children.
|
|
coco
Researcher
Posts: 153
|
Post by coco on May 25, 2010 20:50:48 GMT 1
Genuine USO or Natural Phenomena? www.damninteresting.com/the-fiery-balls-of-nagaWritten by Alan Bellows on 22 October 2005 Supernatural phenomena always seem to be met by photographers who possess a supernatural ability to botch a simple photograph, and the Naga Fireballs phenomenon of the Mekong river in Thailand is no exception. Images of these glowing, egg-sized orbs are always grainy, indistinct, and from a distance, but one factor does lend these fireballs the credibility that it’s supernatural cousins lack… thousands upon thousands of eyewitnesses every year for over 100 years. In fact, they have been observed by so many that their existence is not really debated, rather it is their cause that prompts lively discussion. Locals claim that these fireballs are the product of the “Naga,” a large magical serpent who patrols the river. Every year, around the end of October, hundreds of locals and tourists gather to watch the pinkish-red, glowing orbs emerge randomly from the water, and soar into the sky without a sound or smoke trail. The number of fireballs varies from year to year, but according to locals, the fireballs have occurred annually as far back as generational memory can reach. The attempts at scientific explanations leave much to be desired, such as the theory proposed by Manas Kanoksin, a doctor from Nong Khai. He strongly believes that fermenting sediment on the river’s bottom causes pockets of methane gas to form, and that the Earth’s position in relation to the sun during those days of the year causes them to rise, then spontaneously ignite in the presence of ionized oxygen. But other researchers dismiss this claim, pointing out that the rocky river bottom doesn’t have much sediment, and that the water’s turbulence would break up any such methane bubbles before they reached the water’s surface. A 2002 study using robotic submarines indicated that the methane theory was at least viable, but did not address the question of how the bubbles could reach the surface intact. There is also the very real possibility that the fireballs are man made, but the architects of such a hoax would have to be clever indeed to avoid detection for these hundreds of years.
|
|
coco
Researcher
Posts: 153
|
Post by coco on May 25, 2010 20:42:03 GMT 1
Hello, I'm Coco and I am pleased with Judge360's and Manxbox' efforts. You guys have a great forum here and I am honored to be thought worthy of invitation. I have never seen a UFO (that I'm aware of), but I have seen plenty of satellites and shooting stars. Nonetheless, I am fascinated by the phenomena and hope that I can be a positive contributor at least as a supporter to this group. Maybe one day I will be able to submit an experience of my own.
|
|