mike69
Photo Analysist
Posts: 225
|
Post by mike69 on Jan 30, 2011 18:59:51 GMT 1
Admin Note: Edit to correct date
|
|
mike69
Photo Analysist
Posts: 225
|
Post by mike69 on Jan 30, 2011 19:01:58 GMT 1
another video same thing cgi judge???
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 30, 2011 19:06:17 GMT 1
Hi mike i saw this the other day, im currently trying to gather as much on this as i can at the min, This is one of the better video's out there mike
|
|
mike69
Photo Analysist
Posts: 225
|
Post by mike69 on Jan 30, 2011 19:08:13 GMT 1
kkkkkkkkkkkk they are here
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 30, 2011 19:22:48 GMT 1
|
|
mike69
Photo Analysist
Posts: 225
|
Post by mike69 on Jan 30, 2011 19:36:15 GMT 1
big flash ,i hope this film is real
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 30, 2011 19:40:24 GMT 1
I would like to see the frame where it shoots up into the sky
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 30, 2011 20:14:56 GMT 1
Ive been looking over the above gif image frames for around 15 - 20 mins now and i see some things that dont add up. You have what appear to the right tree's, now when the flash intensifies there is no light coming through the trees which i think you would see considering the brightness of the flash. The flash itself just doesnt look right it fills the screen as if it was just added in, and it looks like they forgot to edit the part where the tree's are. Just below the UFO there is a light to the left, and abit further left there is another light too, now this light further left looks identical to the UFO light. Im calling CGI on this. If anyone can see something i dont im all ears
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 30, 2011 20:49:40 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by meldrew on Jan 30, 2011 21:24:10 GMT 1
its new to me, are there any reports with a date/time, according to the header this happens on the 30th november 2011, time travel ;D, my fist thought was, someone else must have witnessed this as its a populated area, have there been any other reports or just this video.
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 30, 2011 21:33:00 GMT 1
Not that i know of meldrew, if this is real it will be big news over there. Israel has cameras all over the city just like new york and most other citys too, if its real these cams wouldve recorded it, so we shall have to keep an eye out for any news reports on this. If there is nothing at all, then this is a Hoax! A good one at that too
|
|
|
Post by prettyboyfloyd on Jan 30, 2011 21:33:58 GMT 1
I seen this yesty on Lus. Didnt think much of it.But after having another few looks again.It is amazing footage.Surely there must have been others that witnessed this?.Its in a built up area.Could be Cgi could be real?pisses ya off when you cannot find out the truth lol. Cheers:Prettyboyfloyd
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 30, 2011 21:49:58 GMT 1
I seen this yesty on Lus. Didnt think much of it.But after having another few looks again.It is amazing footage.Surely there must have been others that witnessed this?.Its in a built up area.Could be Cgi could be real?pisses ya off when you cannot find out the truth lol. Cheers:Prettyboyfloyd Keep a look out over the next few days on the News if nothing is mentioned you can bet its a Hoax. This like said will have been witnessed by loads and will be big news.
|
|
mike69
Photo Analysist
Posts: 225
|
Post by mike69 on Jan 31, 2011 1:22:10 GMT 1
YOU ARE THE BEST JUDGE
|
|
mike69
Photo Analysist
Posts: 225
|
Post by mike69 on Jan 31, 2011 4:11:31 GMT 1
after several views, determine that this footage is fake kkkkkkk look like an expert. when you start the video (synchronized) did not show any image on the right side, just dark, but if they see the video on the left he is already capturing the image, so the footage had to start over with the image of ufo;). also noticed that the image that appears on tel at the beginning of video does not match what he's supposed to shoot;) case closed kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
would be born a pine tree in the ass of these guys: (
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 31, 2011 4:18:36 GMT 1
YOU ARE THE BEST JUDGE LOL i wouldnt say that mike, i just try to get all the info and point out the obvious. Its a very good video and the fact that there's 2 video's makes it harder to prove a fake. I could be wrong it might be real but im leaning towards cgi at the moment with what ive seen so far. Something else ive noticed in both video's, neither of them zoomed into the UFO i wonder why that is
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 31, 2011 4:29:24 GMT 1
This video below has been posted on youtube, the comments below it are of the poster of the video on youtube. www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fdd1XBX74Dk&feature=player_embeddedQuote: This is a stabilized version of the Temple Mount UFO video. The brightness and contrast have also been increased. This video highlights a major flaw of perspective, and proves it is fake.
Everyone should know that objects further away from the camera move more slowly than objects closer to the camera. That is called PARALLAX.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallax
However, in this video, the city lights move faster than the man, wall, and tree which is closer to the camera. That is impossible. Also, the city lights move independently from the camera movement, that is not possible either. The city lights should be locked to the camera movement, and the man, wall, and tree should only be moving.
Hold your hand steady in front of your computer screen, close one eye, and move your head around... you will see the computer screen appears stationary while your hand moves around. That is how the city lights should move.
This video shows signs of being a composite.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compositing
Either a type of "green screen" or a "mask" was used to insert the city lights of Jerusalem into the scene. The man, the wall, and the tree were filmed first. Whoever made this video cut out the area around the man, above the wall, and next to the tree, and then inserted the city lights behind it.
You can get a good view of the "mask" or area that was cut out when you see the fake flash of light. When they created the fake light flash, they only increased the contrast of the city lights but not the rest of the scene (except for the edges of the man which is caused by blending the mask). You can see a good image here:
img692.imageshack.us/i/hoaxfak...
Also, light should not have reached the back right side of the man's jacket, that is impossible if the light is coming from the front. Also, if you look close at the image above you will see a dark shadow line along the right edge of the jacket too, that is impossible if the jacket is illuminated as well.
The lights are fake... there is no point source. It's just a magical increase in brightness on top of the scene.
The video of the UFO is CGI, and is a HOAX.
-edit for clarity-
Draw a horizontal line across the horizon of the city lights. Now draw a horizontal line across the top of the brick wall. These two lines should stay perfectly parallel to each other no matter what movement occurs. However, in the video you can see the two lines are constantly changing! This is only possible if they are on a boat on water! The horizon is completely FAKE.
It's a HOAX. |
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 31, 2011 5:04:11 GMT 1
This video is the same as the one i posted above ^^^ This time the poster has motion tracked the horizon with parralel lines take a look: www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHOc35nmUDk&feature=player_embeddedQuote: This time I motion tracked the horizon so that it stays in one spot. Notice how the angle of the edge of the wall changes, but the angle of the horizon stays the same, THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE. Unless he is on a boat, or is in a super large Earthquake, the angle of the horizon and the edge of the wall should remain locked together. Because they don't, this means the entire horizon is fake. |
|
|
mike69
Photo Analysist
Posts: 225
|
Post by mike69 on Jan 31, 2011 5:07:27 GMT 1
nice work
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 31, 2011 5:28:19 GMT 1
nice work Thanks mike Keep an eye out for anything else on this over the next couple of days or so, id love to see some more reports and news on this other than the 2 video's weve got to go on. Like ive said if this is real there will be more to come from this & most probably will hit the news
|
|
mike69
Photo Analysist
Posts: 225
|
Post by mike69 on Jan 31, 2011 5:40:08 GMT 1
not believe that out in the news, let's see;) I'm watching a documentary about abductions (Zone Reality))
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 31, 2011 6:00:14 GMT 1
|
|
mike69
Photo Analysist
Posts: 225
|
Post by mike69 on Jan 31, 2011 6:11:23 GMT 1
kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkwere is the flash?
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 31, 2011 6:47:27 GMT 1
I think this is going to get really messy lol. The 3rd video screams fake, unlike the other 2 which are a hell of alot harder to debunk. Is this a case of a Hoax on top of a Hoax ? I think so, let me know what you think
|
|
mike69
Photo Analysist
Posts: 225
|
Post by mike69 on Jan 31, 2011 7:04:01 GMT 1
someone saw the first videos and I wanted to join in the fun kkkkkkk pine for this one too;)
|
|
mike69
Photo Analysist
Posts: 225
|
Post by mike69 on Jan 31, 2011 7:07:41 GMT 1
I'll try to sleep, bye
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 31, 2011 7:08:58 GMT 1
someone saw the first videos and I wanted to join in the fun kkkkkkk pine for this one too;) Not sure what you mean mike ?
|
|
mike69
Photo Analysist
Posts: 225
|
Post by mike69 on Jan 31, 2011 17:48:41 GMT 1
someone saw the first videos and I wanted to join in the fun kkkkkkk pine for this one too;) sorry ,what i mean is this, someone saw the first videos and join the fun. would be born a pine tree in ass of this guys
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 31, 2011 19:35:21 GMT 1
Yes mike the third video is most definately a Hoax! I cant find any info on this in the news today, not that i expected too
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 31, 2011 19:48:20 GMT 1
|
|