|
Post by Electra on Jun 9, 2011 13:32:06 GMT 1
They are jpeg's, Judge.
Sizes 553 bytes and 543 bytes .
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jun 9, 2011 13:35:18 GMT 1
They are jpeg's, Judge. Sizes 553 bytes and 543 bytes . Hmm dont know why then Elektra, have you got a link so i can have ago ?
|
|
|
Post by Electra on Jun 9, 2011 14:46:37 GMT 1
I was trying to upload them as an attachment, straight from my PC. But I see you have linked one of the images above, so I don't think it really necessary now.
What I will do in future is use Photobucket to link to any images. Thank's Judge.
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jun 9, 2011 15:01:31 GMT 1
I was trying to upload them as an attachment, straight from my PC. But I see you have linked one of the images above, so I don't think it really necessary now. What I will do in future is use Photobucket to link to any images. Thank's Judge. No probs I use Imageshack to upload my images, here's the Image from the other co-ords.
|
|
|
Post by Electra on Jun 17, 2011 22:21:46 GMT 1
Well here are some high resolution images it as been said that the anomaly is nothing more than distorted pixels. Below s the original image that Google used for the Mars map which is an ESA Mars Express High Resolution Stereo Camera image ( H5620_0000_ND), taken on 18 May 2008 . Below is a High resolution image taken by the Mars Reconaissance Orbiter Context Camera on 25 January 2010: So as you can see it's actually just 11 pixels of bad data in the original image. So the original pixels have been badly distorted due to the multiple reprocessing in preparation for use in Google Mars.
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jun 17, 2011 22:51:25 GMT 1
Just as I thought a glitch in the goole mars software. Nice one Elektra ;D
|
|