uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 8, 2012 3:28:15 GMT 1
Dr. Judy Wood - Where Did the Towers Go? Where Did The Towers Go is Dr. Judy Wood's book which is a summary of the physical evidence submitted in her federal qui tam case accusing the defendants of science fraud. NIST was mandated by congress to "Determine why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed..." yet NIST admitted to me that they did not analyze the "collapse." The contractors they hired with taxpayer money knowingly allowed the fraudulent report to become final.
Sadly, this case had no support from the "Truth movement," leaving the judges free to ignore the law in order to dismiss the case (which they acknowledged they did) so they could sweep it under the carpet. Had this case been allowed to move forward, the defendants (whose expertise is energy weapons) would have been put under oath (equivalent to subpoena power).
This book contains physical evidence, not theories or speculation, but physical evidence that is overwhelming and conclusive as to what happened. But for the record, Dr. Wood does not believe that our government is responsible for executing the events of 9/11/01; nor does she believe that our government is not responsible for executing the events of 9/11/01.
This is not a case of belief. This is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then 2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then 3) WHO did it. And only then can we address 4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime. You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief. You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don't even know what crime to charge them with. If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you'd better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr. Wood's own research is not speculation. It is a forensic investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01. She doesn't address who did it, nor does she concern herself with that question right now. Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with a "conspiracy theory" of any kind. The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to her research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda. The popular chant, "9/11 was an inside job," is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that "19 bad guys with box cutters did it." Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court. Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
What is presented in this book is not a theory and it is not speculation. It is evidence. It is the body of empirical evidence that must be explained in order to determine what happened.
For more about Dr. Judy Wood, go to www.drjudywood.com.
To see more about the book and order your copy, go to www.wheredidthetowersgo.com. |
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWjktDuIhR8
|
|
|
Post by ronologic on Jan 8, 2012 19:25:35 GMT 1
Dr. Judy Wood - Where Did the Towers Go? Where Did The Towers Go is Dr. Judy Wood's book which is a summary of the physical evidence submitted in her federal qui tam case accusing the defendants of science fraud. NIST was mandated by congress to "Determine why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed..." yet NIST admitted to me that they did not analyze the "collapse." The contractors they hired with taxpayer money knowingly allowed the fraudulent report to become final.
Sadly, this case had no support from the "Truth movement," leaving the judges free to ignore the law in order to dismiss the case (which they acknowledged they did) so they could sweep it under the carpet. Had this case been allowed to move forward, the defendants (whose expertise is energy weapons) would have been put under oath (equivalent to subpoena power).
This book contains physical evidence, not theories or speculation, but physical evidence that is overwhelming and conclusive as to what happened. But for the record, Dr. Wood does not believe that our government is responsible for executing the events of 9/11/01; nor does she believe that our government is not responsible for executing the events of 9/11/01.
This is not a case of belief. This is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then 2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then 3) WHO did it. And only then can we address 4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime. You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief. You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don't even know what crime to charge them with. If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you'd better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr. Wood's own research is not speculation. It is a forensic investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01. She doesn't address who did it, nor does she concern herself with that question right now. Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with a "conspiracy theory" of any kind. The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to her research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda. The popular chant, "9/11 was an inside job," is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that "19 bad guys with box cutters did it." Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court. Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
What is presented in this book is not a theory and it is not speculation. It is evidence. It is the body of empirical evidence that must be explained in order to determine what happened.
For more about Dr. Judy Wood, go to www.drjudywood.com.
To see more about the book and order your copy, go to www.wheredidthetowersgo.com. |
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWjktDuIhR8Start of Interview between Art Bell and John Lear: A= Art Bell J = John Lear A - Other than the fact that we got in touch once again John, I really am curious. Why! After 10 years, why break your silence now? and Welcome! J - Thank you Art, You mean I could have said, "No!" ? A - laughs heartily - Yeah! Too late! laughs again. Yeah! You could have said, No! Sure! I'm - I'm serious - Why after 10 years of not a peep, why now? J - Well you know, the government in charge of this coverup, - uh - works so well at making your life miserable when you go around talking about this stuff, that I quit and my life - the quality of my life improved about 200%. But now, the coverup is so well in place, that they certainly would not be threatened by me going on the radio just once and saying what I know. A - Yeah! Well, you lost jobs because of this, right? J - Yeah - I lost two. I lost one with an airline and one with a government program that I really wanted. It was with Lockheed, and they went for my clearance and they were told by the airforce that now - under no circumstances would John Lear ever get another clearance. Now - I had a clearance up at the test site for some work I did with Dyn-electron - it was just monitoring below ground tests from the air with different airplane, but - uh - that clearance is still there, - not active - but they weren't going to renew it under any circumstances and they made it plain - so its cost me a little bit, but I managed to survive. A - Um - all right! You know - before we launch into the whole spectrum of things we have to talk about John, uh - when you and I were on the phone the other day, you began to tell me about 9/11 and I'd really would like to talk about that. Uh - you have a perspective on the 9/11 thing that people should at least hear. I mean - everybody can make up their own minds about it, but you're a commercial pilot and there are certain things you know. So how about it? J - Well! This is a sensitive subject, and I told you that I was hesitant to talk about it. A - That's why I'm bringing it up first! (Art laughs again) J - But whoever concocted 9/11, and it certainly wasn't Osama Bin Ladin, they had two objectives - one was to polarize American's opinion against Arab-Muslims and number two was to get the United States - trick the U.S. - essentially to get Osama out of Afghanistan because Osama - as bad as he was - he was shutting down all the heroin poppy fields and was causing a disastrous monetary loss to the illegal drug industry - and last year, which was a year after we went into Afghanistan, National Geographic did a special on TV, that ran for several months and documented the 500% increase in drugs flowing out of Afghanistan 'after' we went in there and eliminated Osama. A - laughs - They actually did. I recall that. I remember that report! Um - so you are sort of charging that we went in there after Osama - after Osama to rescue the drug trade? J - No! Well - that wasn't what 'we' thought - we were sort of tricked into doing that. We were tricked into thinking that Osama was responsible for 9/11, but to get a proper perspective on who 'did' the World Trade Center - uh - you have to understand what a magnificent feat of airmanship this was. It was 'disastrous' and was horrible for this country, but this was not accomplished by some guys who went to Florida and got some instructions on a Cessna or a Piper and this was not accomplished by somebody who had a right seat on a 727. A - What about simulators? Flight simulators? J - This had to be accomplished by pilots who got instruction - were taken to 'honest-to-God' Boeing 757 simulators which is - you know - the 757 and 767 the same cockpit essentially and you get the same rating and whoever concocted this whole thing knew that on a particular day that airplanes themselves could be switched because of maintenance problems and by selecting airlines that had that airplane, they had everything covered. A - Huh! So it actually took a fair amount of skill to plow into those buildings? J - I would say that it took about 200 or 300 hours for each pilot - and we're talking about . . . A - 200 or 300 hours? But you mean of simulator time? J - Of simulator time! They had to learn how to step into the cockpit - and that's a whole thing - getting into the airplane, but that's separate from that - they had to get into the cockpit and pull the circuit breaker for the transponder - sit in the pilot seat, disconnect the auto-pilot from the flight management system - turn the airplane, push the throttles all the way forward, find Manhattan - then line up on a pre-planned course - doing 10 miles a minute - they were clocked by air traffic control doing 600 miles an hour at 700 feet above the ground and fly directly into the middle the center of the World Trade Center. Now that - you know and the air races only fly 400 miles an hour and that's difficult - but to fly an airliner like the size of a 757 at 700 feet - I mean that took some skill and that took a long time to train that - probably a year. A - That's wild (unintelligible) J - In addition to that - hitting the Trade Center was a feat - but hitting the Pentagon was even more of a feat because when you are going that fast there is a tremendous amount of air creating this lift and as you head towards the ground, that air reacts against the wing and pushes you up, so whoever - whoever hit that - trained to hit the Pentagon at the 3rd story was highly trained because when he came towards the ground - there was a tremendous amount of lift and you would have to trim forward and push with an incredible amount of strength to not be pushed up and over the Pentagon to hit the 3rd story. A - But what about the plane that went down that didn't make it - that was probably headed towards the Whitehouse? J - uh - Well that was shot down by an F-16 out of a base south of New York and uh . . . A - How can you be so sure? J - Well because there were parts found 5 miles away - uh - because there were eye-witnesses to it being shot down - uh - there is corroborating evidence somebody who was listening to a cell phone conversation at the time this was going on who said they heard the rapid - like the ... described it as a pilot rapidly turning pages - well - that's not what was happening - that was the cannon fire hitting the fuselage and that's what accounted for - what they called the 'smoke ' in the air in the cabin - well that wasn't smoke - that was the depressurization causing the condensation. A - Well so you are saying definitely that you feel it was shot down . . . J - But you have to understand the governments position - #1 - they couldn't 'possibly' reveal this information because - you know - it was something they had to do - the problem was that once the passengers got control of the airplane there was no way to communicate with air traffic control or communicate with whoever was directing the attack for the airforce. www.greatdreams.com/John-Lear.htmThe above partial interview can be seen in its entirity at the above web site.
|
|
|
Post by shoefixer on Jan 9, 2012 1:19:40 GMT 1
Dr. Wood has devoted her life to researching the 9/11 atrosoty and the facts are staggering, she is a very clued up lady. The Rockefeller group owned the trade centre.. and I reckon they masterminded the whole operation. The big oil giants are hell bent on mass destruction and terror, these tyrants are worse than Adolf Hitler and will stop at nothing, the next big catastrophe will be even bigger than 9/11.. some people reckon it will be global with the use of bio and nuke weapons. The big money people are in charge of the military. Has anybody heard of the death camps they have in the US ?.. apparently these fema camps are ready for the NWO and are similar to Auswich nazi camp. Also the "government" want to micro chip us.. like cattle !... we live in scary times folks, very scary times.
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 9, 2012 3:29:55 GMT 1
Dr. Wood has devoted her life to researching the 9/11 atrosoty and the facts are staggering, she is a very clued up lady. The Rockefeller group owned the trade centre.. and I reckon they masterminded the whole operation. The big oil giants are hell bent on mass destruction and terror, these tyrants are worse than Adolf Hitler and will stop at nothing, the next big catastrophe will be even bigger than 9/11.. some people reckon it will be global with the use of bio and nuke weapons. The big money people are in charge of the military. Has anybody heard of the death camps they have in the US ?.. apparently these fema camps are ready for the NWO and are similar to Auswich nazi camp. Also the "government" want to micro chip us.. like cattle !... we live in scary times folks, very scary times. Yes her evidence is very interesting and should not just be dissmissed. There's some footage where tthe steel gurders litteraly turn to dust in mid air. Ive heard of the FEMA camps I havnt a clue what they are for but they must be there for something. www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtElk4aHBWM&feature=related
|
|
|
Post by ronologic on Jan 9, 2012 4:58:18 GMT 1
Dr. Wood has devoted her life to researching the 9/11 atrosoty and the facts are staggering, she is a very clued up lady. The Rockefeller group owned the trade centre.. and I reckon they masterminded the whole operation. The big oil giants are hell bent on mass destruction and terror, these tyrants are worse than Adolf Hitler and will stop at nothing, the next big catastrophe will be even bigger than 9/11.. some people reckon it will be global with the use of bio and nuke weapons. The big money people are in charge of the military. Has anybody heard of the death camps they have in the US ?.. apparently these fema camps are ready for the NWO and are similar to Auswich nazi camp. Also the "government" want to micro chip us.. like cattle !... we live in scary times folks, very scary times. According to the following article the Silverstein Group owned the towers. Silverstein Makes a Huge Profit off of the 9/11 Attacks Six months before the 9/11 attacks the World Trade Center was "privatized" by being leased to a private sector developer. The lease was purchased by the Silverstein Group for $3.2 billion. "This is a dream come true," Larry Silverstein said. "We will be in control of a prized asset, and we will seek to develop its potential, raising it to new heights." But the World Trade Towers were not the real estate plum we are led to believe. From an economic standpoint, the trade center -- subsidized since its inception -- has never functioned, nor was it intended to function, unprotected in the rough-and-tumble real estate marketplace. [BusinessWeek] How could Silverstein Group have been ignorant of this? Also, the towers required some $200 million in renovations and improvements, most of which related to removal and replacement of building materials declared to be health hazards in the years since the towers were built. It was well-known by the city of New York that the WTC was an asbestos bombshell. For years, the Port Authority treated the building like an aging dinosaur, attempting on several occasions to get permits to demolish the building for liability reasons, but being turned down due the known asbestos problem. Further, it was well-known the only reason the building was still standing until 9/11 was because it was too costly to disassemble the twin towers floor by floor since the Port Authority was prohibited legally from demolishing the buildings. [Arctic Beacon] Other New York developers had been driven into bankruptcy by the costly mandated renovations, and $200 million represented an entire year's worth of revenues from the World Trade Towers. The perfect collapse of the twin towers changed the picture. Under a pending agreement, a developer and his investors will get back most of the down payment that they made to lease the World Trade Center just six weeks before a terrorist attack destroyed the twin towers. Developer Larry Silverstein and investors Lloyd Goldman and Joseph Cayre are nearing a deal that would give them about $98 million of their original investment of $124 million, The New York Times reported Saturday. [MontereyHerald 11/22/2003] Instead of renovation, Silverstein is rebuilding, funded by the insurance coverage on the property which 'fortuitously' covered acts of terrorism. Even better, Silverstein filed TWO insurance claims for the maximum amount of the policy, based on the two, in Silverstein's view, separate attacks. The total potential payout is $7.1 billion, more than enough to build a fabulous new complex and leave a hefty profit for the Silverstein Group, including Larry Silverstein himself. As reported in The Washington Post, the insurance company, Swiss Re, has gone to court to argue that the 9/11 disaster was only one attack, not two and that therefore the insurance payout should be limited to $3.55 billion, still enough to rebuild the complex. Update: WTC Leaseholder May Collect Up To $4.6B A federal jury on Monday ruled that the assault on the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center was in fact two occurrences for insurance purposes. The finding in U.S. District Court in Manhattan means leaseholder Larry Silverstein may collect up to $4.6 billion, according to reports. [Forbes.com 12/06/04] The result of court ruling: Silverstein makes a huge profit off of the 9/11 attacks. Source: whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/silverstein.html
|
|
|
Post by prettyboyfloyd on Jan 9, 2012 14:10:30 GMT 1
Thanks for putting this thread up Uforn Absoultely brilliant i watched tonight. ronigical and shoefixer.The Usa is the axis of pure evil. ''Dustification and Spontaneous Combustion" Cheers:Prettyboyfloyd
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 9, 2012 15:57:08 GMT 1
Thanks for putting this thread up Uforn Absoultely brilliant i watched tonight. ronigical and shoefixer.The Usa is the axis of pure evil. ''Dustification and Spontaneous Combustion" Cheers:Prettyboyfloyd No probs mate There's also an interview with Dr Judy Wood by Richard D Hall of Richplanet TV www.youtube.com/watch?v=udDkMP4MF6A
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 9, 2012 17:49:07 GMT 1
According to the following article the Silverstein Group owned the towers. This isnt correct ron, Larry Silverstein signed for the Lease of the World Trade Center and got it on the 24 July 2001. He got this from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_SilversteinThe original idea for the World Trade Center is credited to David Rockerfellow who with the help of his brother Nelson Rockefeller got the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey involved. So Rockerfellow did in fact own the World Trade Center imo, there's more information here: science.howstuffworks.com/engineering/structural/wtc.htm
|
|
|
Post by shoefixer on Jan 10, 2012 2:38:45 GMT 1
Thanks guys, it seems you boys do a load of research and facts are essential in these discussions. Have any of you guys seen EndGame or Zeitgeist ?.. WOW, honestly these two "documentaries" are ideal for waking up those people (everyone including ourselves) who are enslaved by the false economy, junk food, drugs, pornography, television, fashion, propaganda peddling news channels . . etc. etc. I watched these two programmes last year .. hmm ? I used the word " programmes " - is this a cliche ? are they called programmes for a reason ? are we subconsciously programmed by the big AGENDA ?? .. I reckon we are, psyops can make you spend your money on stuff you didnt intend buying just by using clever advertising techniques.. I am not saying we are all like Homer Simpson, but its quite scary how many people are just like Homer.. and they think it is normal, people like this will never wake up because they are bathing in the rewards of satan. The world is in a hopeless state of affairs... and I blame the American dream. YEAH WHAT A RANTER I AM !!! HA HA !
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 10, 2012 16:49:26 GMT 1
Thanks guys, it seems you boys do a load of research and facts are essential in these discussions. Have any of you guys seen EndGame or Zeitgeist ?.. WOW, honestly these two "documentaries" are ideal for waking up those people (everyone including ourselves) who are enslaved by the false economy, junk food, drugs, pornography, television, fashion, propaganda peddling news channels . . etc. etc. I watched these two programmes last year .. hmm ? I used the word " programmes " - is this a cliche ? are they called programmes for a reason ? are we subconsciously programmed by the big AGENDA ?? .. I reckon we are, psyops can make you spend your money on stuff you didnt intend buying just by using clever advertising techniques.. I am not saying we are all like Homer Simpson, but its quite scary how many people are just like Homer.. and they think it is normal, people like this will never wake up because they are bathing in the rewards of satan. The world is in a hopeless state of affairs... and I blame the American dream. YEAH WHAT A RANTER I AM !!! HA HA ! Your welcome, I cant speak for anyone else but I do a hell of alot of Research and facts are essential, not just with topics like this but with UFO's too. I cant remember if Ive seen endgame or zeitgeist.
|
|
|
Post by ronologic on Jan 10, 2012 23:38:53 GMT 1
Thanks guys, it seems you boys do a load of research and facts are essential in these discussions. Have any of you guys seen EndGame or Zeitgeist ?.. WOW, honestly these two "documentaries" are ideal for waking up those people (everyone including ourselves) who are enslaved by the false economy, junk food, drugs, pornography, television, fashion, propaganda peddling news channels . . etc. etc. I watched these two programmes last year .. hmm ? I used the word " programmes " - is this a cliche ? are they called programmes for a reason ? are we subconsciously programmed by the big AGENDA ?? .. I reckon we are, psyops can make you spend your money on stuff you didnt intend buying just by using clever advertising techniques.. I am not saying we are all like Homer Simpson, but its quite scary how many people are just like Homer.. and they think it is normal, people like this will never wake up because they are bathing in the rewards of satan. The world is in a hopeless state of affairs... and I blame the American dream. YEAH WHAT A RANTER I AM !!! HA HA ! Your welcome, I cant speak for anyone else but I do a hell of alot of Research and facts are essential, not just with topics like this but with UFO's too. I cant remember if Ive seen endgame or zeitgeist. I own a copy of Zeitgeist. Very eye opening. Endgame is something with which I am unfamiliar, but not for long. From what I've read on the Twin Towers, My take on the articles is that they were owned by the Port authority. Yes, I try to be as accurate as possible on all subjucts posted here, although I must admit I did drop the ball on the Twin Tower owner debate.
|
|
|
Post by ronologic on Jan 11, 2012 0:12:03 GMT 1
Thanks guys, it seems you boys do a load of research and facts are essential in these discussions. Have any of you guys seen EndGame or Zeitgeist ?.. WOW, honestly these two "documentaries" are ideal for waking up those people (everyone including ourselves) who are enslaved by the false economy, junk food, drugs, pornography, television, fashion, propaganda peddling news channels . . etc. etc. I watched these two programmes last year .. hmm ? I used the word " programmes " - is this a cliche ? are they called programmes for a reason ? are we subconsciously programmed by the big AGENDA ?? .. I reckon we are, psyops can make you spend your money on stuff you didnt intend buying just by using clever advertising techniques.. I am not saying we are all like Homer Simpson, but its quite scary how many people are just like Homer.. and they think it is normal, people like this will never wake up because they are bathing in the rewards of satan. The world is in a hopeless state of affairs... and I blame the American dream. YEAH WHAT A RANTER I AM !!! HA HA ! I believe greed was invented long before the American Dream.
|
|
|
Post by ronologic on Jan 11, 2012 0:16:28 GMT 1
Thanks guys, it seems you boys do a load of research and facts are essential in these discussions. Have any of you guys seen EndGame or Zeitgeist ?.. WOW, honestly these two "documentaries" are ideal for waking up those people (everyone including ourselves) who are enslaved by the false economy, junk food, drugs, pornography, television, fashion, propaganda peddling news channels . . etc. etc. I watched these two programmes last year .. hmm ? I used the word " programmes " - is this a cliche ? are they called programmes for a reason ? are we subconsciously programmed by the big AGENDA ?? .. I reckon we are, psyops can make you spend your money on stuff you didnt intend buying just by using clever advertising techniques.. I am not saying we are all like Homer Simpson, but its quite scary how many people are just like Homer.. and they think it is normal, people like this will never wake up because they are bathing in the rewards of satan. The world is in a hopeless state of affairs... and I blame the American dream. YEAH WHAT A RANTER I AM !!! HA HA ! Numerous videos titled "End Game" exsist. To which video were you referring?
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Jan 11, 2012 16:04:40 GMT 1
From what I've read on the Twin Towers, My take on the articles is that they were owned by the Port authority. Yes, I try to be as accurate as possible on all subjucts posted here, although I must admit I did drop the ball on the Twin Tower owner debate. Rockefeller commissioned early designs for the WTC in 1958, the Port Authority got involved in 1960, and the initial plans were made public in 1961. This would put David Rockefellow as the rightfull owner and not the Port Authority.
|
|
|
Post by bob on Jan 12, 2012 5:30:09 GMT 1
The twin towers were the responsibility of the Port Authority but the insurance claim was set up to pay one recipient, Mr. Silverstein. This is one of 1000 articles on the subject. www.911myths.com/html/wtc_insurance.html
|
|
|
Post by sddwashington on Feb 3, 2013 9:32:48 GMT 1
Now I can die at peace. For 12 years I have wrestled and wrestled with the whole 9/11 affair. For 9 of those 12 years my life has been pretty much destroyed because of being there at 9/11. I lost my wife. My Children hated me. I was harassed by the United States Government and the Secret Service and the F.B.I and the NSA and the Telco,s Sprint and AT&T and Verision and the Maryland State Police.
Dr. Judy Wood, Who are you? You have set this man free and released his soul to be at peace and touch the Face of God. I will answer no comments.
|
|
|
Post by dbh on Feb 4, 2013 21:23:38 GMT 1
SDD... thank you for sharing. I remember watching that day in complete horror. I cannot imagine living that dayup close an personal...
|
|
|
Post by sddwashington on Feb 27, 2013 5:23:46 GMT 1
Yes indeed my friends here. Where did those Bloody towers go? Since the year 2004 in June when I made my release to the public, I got notice the same month that I had Lymphoplasmacitic Cancer. Was it from depleted Uranium 238? Now the Cancer is in my Lungs. Oh yes spot on George Bush. A private American trying to find passengers, that were not even there. Nobody paid attention to me except FBI agent Eckstine.
This Dr. Judy Wood I have to see before my demise. None of you here at this board understand the issue,s I had to see and the great and wonderful United States Government, yea, Truth Justice and the American way. This is really a British site and I wish the Brits would throw ther 2 cents in this issue but what is the use? What is done is done. This is not off topic. It is in the thread:Dr. Judy Wood - Where did the towers go? I am sorry Members but I had to say that Dr. Woods is on to something. But the research study of UFO,s is my life next to my studies of Theology and God Himself what ever you conceive Him to be.
|
|
Aelius
Researcher
Deep Thought.
Posts: 178
|
Post by Aelius on Mar 3, 2013 6:48:52 GMT 1
I was in high school when this happened. This will forever be America's stained history for greed.
|
|