uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Oct 2, 2012 16:13:05 GMT 1
Ancient Aliens Debunked Ancient Aliens Debunked is a 3 hour refutation of the theories proposed on the History Channel series Ancient Aliens. It is essentially a point by point critique of the "ancient astronaut theory" which has been proposed by people like Erich von Däniken and Zecharia Sitchin as well as many others. The film covers topics like: Ancient building sites: Puma Punku, The Pyramids, Baalbek, Incan sites, And Easter Island. Ancient artifacts: Pacal's rocket, the Nazca lines, the Tolima "fighter jets", the Egyptian "light bulb", Ufo's in ancient art, and the crystal skulls. Ancient text issues: Ezekiel's wheel, Ancient nuclear warfare, Vimana's, the Anunnaki, and the Nephilim. All the claims are sourced at the website: ancientaliensdebunked.comIt was produced by Chris White and includes commentary from Dr. Michael Hesier. www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=zuZmhb5yrsISee it all in one section, or check references at ancientaliensdebunked.com or to see the individual sections click time signatures below: Intro ( 0:00 ) ancientaliensdebunked.com/references-and-transcripts/124-2/ Puma Punku ( 3:38 ) or ancientaliensdebunked.com/references-and-transcripts/puma-punku/The Pyramids ( 22:41 ) Or ancientaliensdebunked.com/references-and-transcripts/the-pyramids/Baalbek, ( 37:40 ) Or ancientaliensdebunked.com/references-and-transcripts/baalbek/Incan sites ( 55:33 ) Or ancientaliensdebunked.com/references-and-transcripts/incan-sites/Easter Island ( 1:01:33 ) Or ancientaliensdebunked.com/references-and-transcripts/easter-island/Pacal's rocket ( 1:05:36 ) Or ancientaliensdebunked.com/references-and-transcripts/pacals-rocket/The Nazca Lines ( 1:13:10 ) Or ancientaliensdebunked.com/references-and-transcripts/nazca-lines/Tolima "fighter jets ( 1:21:16 ) ancientaliensdebunked.com/references-and-transcripts/tolima-fighter-jets/ Egyptian "light bulb" ( 1:27:01 ) ancientaliensdebunked.com/references-and-transcripts/112-2/ Ufo's in ancient art ( 1:36:08 ) ancientaliensdebunked.com/references-and-transcripts/ufos-in-ancient-art/ The crystal skulls ( 1:46:38 ) ancientaliensdebunked.com/references-and-transcripts/crystal-skulls/ Ezekiel's Wheel ( 1:58:17 ) ancientaliensdebunked.com/references-and-transcripts/ezekiels-wheels/ Ancient nuclear warfare ( 2:11:16 ) ancientaliensdebunked.com/references-and-transcripts/ancient-nuclear-w... Vimana's ( 2:20:50 ) ancientaliensdebunked.com/references-and-transcripts/vimanas/Anunnaki ( 2:32:52 ) ancientaliensdebunked.com/references-and-transcripts/anunnaki/Nephilim ( 2:54:37 ) ancientaliensdebunked.com/references-and-transcripts/nephilim/ Conclusion ( 3:07:10 ancientaliensdebunked.com/references-and-transcripts/misc-and-conclusion/
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Oct 2, 2012 17:08:04 GMT 1
Ive noticed that the reaction to this video on other forums is quite negative with alot of people unwilling to spare 3hrs of there time. I on the other hand like to look at all the possibilities, so I will be watching this with an open mind as I do with anything of this nature.
|
|
|
Post by meldrew on Oct 2, 2012 18:18:30 GMT 1
Ive noticed that the reaction to this video on other forums is quite negative with alot of people unwilling to spare 3hrs of there time. I on the other hand like to look at all the possibilities, so I will be watching this with an open mind as I do with anything of this nature. I haven't got the broad band speed to down load a 3hr video, I think Ancient Aliens is easy meat for the debunkers, I think this because like art, it is down to your own personal concept, we don't know and will never know, we can only make educated guesses at what each and everything is, I have to admit that some of the ooparts are as evidence a bit flimsy, and the nazca lines are not landing strips for spaceships, I think the subject to big to be debunked in a 3 hr video, a few cases could be looked at but not the whole lot.
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Post by uforn on Oct 2, 2012 18:33:13 GMT 1
Ive noticed that the reaction to this video on other forums is quite negative with alot of people unwilling to spare 3hrs of there time. I on the other hand like to look at all the possibilities, so I will be watching this with an open mind as I do with anything of this nature. I haven't got the broad band speed to down load a 3hr video, I think Ancient Aliens is easy meat for the debunkers, I think this because like art, it is down to your own personal concept, we don't know and will never know, we can only make educated guesses at what each and everything is, I have to admit that some of the ooparts are as evidence a bit flimsy, and the nazca lines are not landing strips for spaceships, I think the subject to big to be debunked in a 3 hr video, a few cases could be looked at but not the whole lot. I have the same problem mate, I use 3 mobile broadband internet. Its not good Sometimes I can watch things without a hitch, other times its impossible. Im at 20 mins on this documentary today (and its one of the days its impossible to watch lol) but so far Im not impressed, there are counter claims without any solid evidence to back them up? Ive not seen any real demonstrations of how the ancients cut/carved the rocks or moved them. The Jury is still out and I think that will be the case throughout the whole documentary. I'll have to wait till Ive got a good connection to be able to view anymore so time will tell. Im sure there's other members with a good internet connection so maybe they could give their views on this ?
|
|
|
Post by meldrew on Oct 4, 2012 19:00:53 GMT 1
the iconoclasts have decided to comment on this, well sit on the fence, are they saying the same a me but making it sound better lol. Heated (and stupid) argumentation about the Ancient Astronaut TheoryOur good friend and “colleague” Gilles Fernandez opened his Facebook page to a discussion about the Ancient Astronaut theory. Gilles presented some Mike Heiser site locations from Mike’s site Ancient Aliens Debunked and a YouTube video: ancientaliensdebunked.com/references-and-transcripts/pacals-rocket/ancientaliensdebunked.com/references-and-transcripts/nazca-lines/www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=zuZmhb5yrsIThe discussion at Gilles’ FB page has devolved into a back-and-forth between me and a few academic reprobates, I see AA theory as interesting conjecture and opinion, sometimes goofy but usually intriguing and imaginatively speculative. Gilles and his FB cohorts hate AA theorists with a passion and are livid that anyone would enjoy their “nonsense.” My view is that AA theory (or its hypotheses) is only as speculative as some archeological and anthropological theories – which I claim are as divided and often as speculative as the AA suggestions. Moreover, Gilles and his friends see the creative musings of Von Däniken and his (as Gilles’ amis have it) lackey Giorgio A. Tsoukalos as fraudulent in extremis. Gilles and his pals have gotten a little over-heated about the issue and are not debating academically or sensibly. And I see that as a psychological quirk: the debunkers are fearful of belief systems that rival their own. Those of you who are interested – and I doubt many of you are – and have a Facebook account might access Gilles page to get in on the fray. It’s not edifying but may engage your need for vituperation, a flush commodity in the UFO community and particularly among UFO skeptics – a hardy vocal group. RR posted by RRRGroup at Wednesday, October 03, 2012 ufocon.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/heated-and-stupid-argumentation-about.html
|
|
|
Post by ronologic on Oct 6, 2012 5:22:17 GMT 1
As I have posted on other threads the ancients drew what the saw on cave walls, cliff sides, boulders, or whereever, be it people, animals, stars, and yes, the classically shaped UFO. There is only one thing shaped like a UFO back then and that was a UFO. What else could it be?
|
|