blucottoncandy
Junior Researcher
100%
as always.... you decide...
Posts: 47
|
Hello
Oct 5, 2012 19:14:47 GMT 1
Post by blucottoncandy on Oct 5, 2012 19:14:47 GMT 1
Hello...
While I have been a visitor here almost everyday for about a year, today I decided to join and participate in various discussions...
I was reading a previous post here and a member mentioned that our planet is currently being visited by upwards of 9 different species.
I recall reading in one of Stan Romanek's book (Messages) that there are roughly 57 different types on our earth.
Of these 57, most are friendly, however there are a few species that are very hostle.
If anyone knows about Dan Burisch, he consistantly talks about 3 main types... P45,000 J-Rods (grays that are really humans 45,000 years into the future that have travelled back through time - hostile)
P52,000 J-Rods (same species of greys, however, 52,000 years in to the future - friendly)
and
P52,000 Nordics ( blond hair - blue eyed future humans that have travelled back through time - friendly)...
just wondering.... what you all believe...
Blu
|
|
|
Hello
Oct 5, 2012 19:30:25 GMT 1
Post by meldrew on Oct 5, 2012 19:30:25 GMT 1
Hello... While I have been a visitor here almost everyday for about a year, today I decided to join and participate in various discussions... I was reading a previous post here and a member mentioned that our planet is currently being visited by upwards of 9 different species. I recall reading in one of Stan Romanek's book (Messages) that there are roughly 57 different types on our earth. Of these 57, most are friendly, however there are a few species that are very hostle. If anyone knows about Dan Burisch, he consistantly talks about 3 main types... P45,000 J-Rods (grays that are really humans 45,000 years into the future that have travelled back through time - hostile) P52,000 J-Rods (same species of greys, however, 52,000 years in to the future - friendly) and P52,000 Nordics ( blond hair - blue eyed future humans that have travelled back through time - friendly)... just wondering.... what you all believe... Blu hey nice to meet a lurker you spelt grey the real way, not gray which is wrong, and your names to long so it will have to be shortened, I hope you are the first of many of the 500 odd lurkers to come out of the lurking closet ;D
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Hello
Oct 5, 2012 19:51:01 GMT 1
Post by uforn on Oct 5, 2012 19:51:01 GMT 1
Welcome to UFORN blu (thats what Ill call you) You have been visiting for a year everyday, why didnt you sign up before? Im after feedback from members on the reasons people dont talk but yet are active on the forum? Everyones opinions matter so feel free to say what you think
|
|
blucottoncandy
Junior Researcher
100%
as always.... you decide...
Posts: 47
|
Hello
Oct 5, 2012 19:57:20 GMT 1
Post by blucottoncandy on Oct 5, 2012 19:57:20 GMT 1
Hello, the reason is very simple.... from the main webpage, which I have visited 1000 times... it is not clear that your site offers a membership or a message board... in fact you have to dig a little even to locate this forum. A simple... "logon" link on the front page would do wonders....
blu
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Hello
Oct 5, 2012 20:05:06 GMT 1
Post by uforn on Oct 5, 2012 20:05:06 GMT 1
I see you found this forum through the Latest UFO Sightings website, whom we are the forum for. Yes Ive noticed its not made clear on that site, Ive spoke about this before with the admin of the site but to no avail. Your here now tho so enjoy the forum, Ill lok forward to your posts
|
|
blucottoncandy
Junior Researcher
100%
as always.... you decide...
Posts: 47
|
Hello
Oct 5, 2012 20:06:27 GMT 1
Post by blucottoncandy on Oct 5, 2012 20:06:27 GMT 1
thank you
|
|
|
Hello
Oct 6, 2012 4:56:27 GMT 1
Post by ronologic on Oct 6, 2012 4:56:27 GMT 1
Welcome aboard blucottoncandy.
I look forward to reading anything you have to add to this site.
You stated that the "...P45,000 J-Rods (grays that are really humans 45,000 years into the future that have travelled back through time - hostile)" Why would they be hostile to us because if they change one thing now they may change their future, or "their present" and immediately dissapear. Make sense?
Again, welcome aboard
|
|
blucottoncandy
Junior Researcher
100%
as always.... you decide...
Posts: 47
|
Hello
Oct 8, 2012 17:59:50 GMT 1
Post by blucottoncandy on Oct 8, 2012 17:59:50 GMT 1
Hi.. i understand your question and it does not make a lot of sense to me either.... however... the information about the P45,000 J-Rods being hostle came from Dan Burisch.. for those who do not know of Dan.... he is an Area 51...whistleblower... if you have time.... watch these... youtu.be/KhK3Os_eE4gyoutu.be/fYpbzHltJc8youtu.be/-nn5-PATk6I
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Hello
Oct 8, 2012 18:03:14 GMT 1
Post by uforn on Oct 8, 2012 18:03:14 GMT 1
Was J-rod not the name of the supposed Alien?
|
|
blucottoncandy
Junior Researcher
100%
as always.... you decide...
Posts: 47
|
Hello
Oct 8, 2012 19:09:35 GMT 1
Post by blucottoncandy on Oct 8, 2012 19:09:35 GMT 1
Here a a snippit transcript...
D is Dan Burisch K is Katie Cassidy from Project Camolot
D: Probably not. And we actually had three kinds of extra-terrestrials, human lineage extra-terrestrials, present. Two kinds of P+45,000 years from now if we were to translate over to Timeline 2. (Difficult subjects, aren’t they?) [smiling] Ah... two representatives from that time. Two representatives from P+52,000 years ahead J-Rods... both of which generally have the anatomical configuration of what would be in ufology called Grays.
K: OK.
D: Gray aliens. And two representatives from P+52,000 Orions who would generally, I guess, in ufological circles I guess one could say, would call Nordics... or Talls.
K: OK. And, and .. were there...
D: Actually they are more human-like, but have larger eyes, very blue eyes, blondish hair, etcetera.
K: I see. And... OK, well, of course I’ve got many questions on this score...
D: So do I.
K: [laughs] But, and for people listening, we would also like to know, were there any “reptilians” present?
D: ...No.... not per se.
K: Ok, can you...
D: What I’ve come to understand... and it’s generally held ... I think I can say it’s generally held within our society... that the notion of a reptilian is a misnomer. And I’m not saying that to apply a negative connotation to the stories that individuals have brought forward, probably mostly forthrightly... Portals = Micro-Wormholes? ...But that when you view or observe, ah, what would be called a Gray... what I would call a J-Rod... ah... the particular ruddy configuration of their skin, that changes in the sudoriferous glandular structure of their... of their skin, can make them appear, during exacerbations of the illness, very reptilian in appearance. And also possibly preying mantis type, ah, in appearance. They have... They are also suffering from a Cockayne-like syndrome which makes them lurch forward, so they appear very preying mantis-like. So I think that possibly many of the accounts which have forthrightly come from individuals who have actually been abducted by the P-45s, have maybe been interpreted as being reptilian in appearance because of their skin structure. But they’re not really reptiles.
K: OK.
D: Now, I’m not saying.... I’m trying to be inclusive here ... that there are things in they... the... in the mind of man and in the glorious universe of God that I don’t know. That there’s a possibility that individuals have been... have encountered alien species not to my reference. Given the fact... I mean, you know... Gosh, I’ve had to accept the fact that there are human beings that many years ahead of us on another timeline co-existing in reality. How hard would it be for me accept that there are other extra-terrestrials of non-human lineage? Of which I’ve only been briefed about one, which was an extra-dimensional species, who have referenced other extra-terrestrial species that I know nothing about.
K: Mm hm.
D: How hard is it for me to accept that, after I’ve been in the presence of a human-lineage extra-terrestrial? I don’t have a problem with that, but at the same time I don’t have evidence to support it either. “Reptilian” in that, if one were under stress, and one had no previous reference to their biology, their pathophysiology, their particular problems, one could reasonably expect, out of a group of people experiencing them, that more than fifty percent of the group could probably say that they were reptilian in appearance.
K: Hm. OK, that’s interesting.
D: That’s the best I can say...
K: So their appearance morphs to some degree into more of a reptilian...
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Hello
Oct 8, 2012 19:21:07 GMT 1
Post by uforn on Oct 8, 2012 19:21:07 GMT 1
Here a a snippit transcript... D is Dan Burisch K is Katie Cassidy from Project Camolot D: Probably not. And we actually had three kinds of extra-terrestrials, human lineage extra-terrestrials, present. Two kinds of P+45,000 years from now if we were to translate over to Timeline 2. (Difficult subjects, aren’t they?) [smiling] Ah... two representatives from that time. Two representatives from P+52,000 years ahead J-Rods... both of which generally have the anatomical configuration of what would be in ufology called Grays. K: OK. D: Gray aliens. And two representatives from P+52,000 Orions who would generally, I guess, in ufological circles I guess one could say, would call Nordics... or Talls. K: OK. And, and .. were there... D: Actually they are more human-like, but have larger eyes, very blue eyes, blondish hair, etcetera. K: I see. And... OK, well, of course I’ve got many questions on this score... D: So do I. K: [laughs] But, and for people listening, we would also like to know, were there any “reptilians” present? D: ...No.... not per se. K: Ok, can you... D: What I’ve come to understand... and it’s generally held ... I think I can say it’s generally held within our society... that the notion of a reptilian is a misnomer. And I’m not saying that to apply a negative connotation to the stories that individuals have brought forward, probably mostly forthrightly... Portals = Micro-Wormholes? ...But that when you view or observe, ah, what would be called a Gray... what I would call a J-Rod... ah... the particular ruddy configuration of their skin, that changes in the sudoriferous glandular structure of their... of their skin, can make them appear, during exacerbations of the illness, very reptilian in appearance. And also possibly preying mantis type, ah, in appearance. They have... They are also suffering from a Cockayne-like syndrome which makes them lurch forward, so they appear very preying mantis-like. So I think that possibly many of the accounts which have forthrightly come from individuals who have actually been abducted by the P-45s, have maybe been interpreted as being reptilian in appearance because of their skin structure. But they’re not really reptiles. K: OK. D: Now, I’m not saying.... I’m trying to be inclusive here ... that there are things in they... the... in the mind of man and in the glorious universe of God that I don’t know. That there’s a possibility that individuals have been... have encountered alien species not to my reference. Given the fact... I mean, you know... Gosh, I’ve had to accept the fact that there are human beings that many years ahead of us on another timeline co-existing in reality. How hard would it be for me accept that there are other extra-terrestrials of non-human lineage? Of which I’ve only been briefed about one, which was an extra-dimensional species, who have referenced other extra-terrestrial species that I know nothing about. K: Mm hm. D: How hard is it for me to accept that, after I’ve been in the presence of a human-lineage extra-terrestrial? I don’t have a problem with that, but at the same time I don’t have evidence to support it either. “Reptilian” in that, if one were under stress, and one had no previous reference to their biology, their pathophysiology, their particular problems, one could reasonably expect, out of a group of people experiencing them, that more than fifty percent of the group could probably say that they were reptilian in appearance. K: Hm. OK, that’s interesting. D: That’s the best I can say... K: So their appearance morphs to some degree into more of a reptilian... Oh dear, project camelot is a scam mate just google Kerry Cassidy, ( its Kerry not Katie ). I already knew the answer to my question I wanted to know if you did. This whole story is a HOAX, take a look at the now defunct UFO Watchdog article on Dan Burisch, here's the link: www.ufowatchdog.com/burischdirtbag.htm
|
|
|
Hello
Oct 8, 2012 19:40:29 GMT 1
Post by meldrew on Oct 8, 2012 19:40:29 GMT 1
I did write a post but binned it, but it did say this is Linda Moulton Howe territory, what with the time travel. however I've never known ufowatchdog to be wrong
|
|
blucottoncandy
Junior Researcher
100%
as always.... you decide...
Posts: 47
|
Hello
Oct 8, 2012 20:16:07 GMT 1
Post by blucottoncandy on Oct 8, 2012 20:16:07 GMT 1
the beautiful thing about being human is that we all have free will....
I dont trust anything that Dan is saying any more or less then I trust what the UFO watchdog may or may not be saying about him... meaning... maybe there are motives on both sides that involve hidden aspects to stories the mainstream public is not aware...
I am also not out to convince anyone or to pursude others to accpet my point of view. We all have reasons to believe what we believe. All I ask is that people look at things with an open mind, and make decisions based on their beliefs and not the beliefs of others... whether these are Dan's or the UFO watchdogs, yours or mine...
as always.... you... the reader should decide...
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Hello
Oct 9, 2012 17:18:28 GMT 1
Post by uforn on Oct 9, 2012 17:18:28 GMT 1
I dont trust anything that Dan is saying any more or less then I trust what the UFO watchdog may or may not be saying about him... meaning... maybe there are motives on both sides that involve hidden aspects to stories the mainstream public is not aware... Ok, well it wasnt just UFO Watchdog that exposed Dan Burisch as a fraud. George Knapp and UFO Magazine did Investigations on him also. Reguarding UFO Magazine I believe it was Vol, 19 No. 4 that has all the investigations done on Burisch, ( if anyone has this issue please let us know ) You can get this issue here: www.ufomag.com/ufo-magazine-archive/volume-19-2004/vol-19-no-4-111.htmlMeldrew ~ Linda Moulton Howe was indeed involved in this Did you check Kerry Cassidy & Project Camelot out blu? Burisch once claimed to have the cure to Cancer He also claimed to have discovered the first seeds of life on earth, on Frenchman's Mountain Ill let you dig into that as Im not going to spoon feed you everything. Ill start with Linda, she claims that Burisch graduated from SUNY Stonybrook with a Ph.D. in Microbiology and Molecular Genetics. But looking at Burisch's background that isnt true. Below is a document of Burisch's background: No-where in that document does it state that he has a Ph.D. in Microbiology and Molecular Genetics. Nor does it state that he graduated from SUNY Stonybrook. Here's a quote said to be from Linda ( I believe this quote is entirely true as it is her style ) Quote: Linda Howe on national radio say's she didn't need to verify any of Burisch's credentials as Burisch's sincerity was proof enough |
If your not familiar with Linda google her. George Knapp also Investigated Burisch like I said so you should look into his Investigation. Here's one link to get you started: www.8newsnow.com/Global/story.asp?S=4190378George Knapp on Burisch claim that he got a doctorate in 1990 at Stony Brook University in New York. Quote: The school says he was never a student there. records show, he had a full time job in Las Vegas as a parole officer |
Burisch claimed he worked out at S4, this is where Bob Lazar claimed he worked. Burisch claims he worked at S4 in 1994. Bob Lazar told his story in 1989. Here's my take on Burisch, he heard Bob Lazars claim and thought he could make it better in his own way so he came up with a story involving an Alien he named J-Rod and invented the whole thing. He has not provided anything to corraborate any of his claims, unlike Bob Lazar who has. Well it just so happens Bob Lazar had something to say about this. Quote: "This is the biggest bull***t story I have ever heard in my life. Anybody that actually believes this guy should be ashamed of themselves. I never worked at Tonopah. I never met this knucklehead," said Bob Lazar. |
Here's the links: www.bibliotecapleyades.net/dan_burisch/esp_dan_burisch_10.htmwww.ufowatchdog.com/burischdirtbag.htmwww.8newsnow.com/Global/story.asp?S=4190378EDIT: to add link to UFO Magazine
|
|
blucottoncandy
Junior Researcher
100%
as always.... you decide...
Posts: 47
|
Hello
Oct 9, 2012 17:40:20 GMT 1
Post by blucottoncandy on Oct 9, 2012 17:40:20 GMT 1
the more I read your words.... I find you interesting...
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Hello
Oct 9, 2012 17:55:50 GMT 1
Post by uforn on Oct 9, 2012 17:55:50 GMT 1
the more I read your words.... I find you interesting... In what way do you find me interesting blu ?
|
|
allan53
Junior Researcher
Posts: 23
|
Hello
Oct 17, 2012 5:18:07 GMT 1
Post by allan53 on Oct 17, 2012 5:18:07 GMT 1
Just out of curiousity, what evidence has Bob Lazar provided?
|
|
uforn
Administrator
Investigator In Training
In Search For The Truth
Posts: 5,400
|
Hello
Oct 17, 2012 15:45:26 GMT 1
Post by uforn on Oct 17, 2012 15:45:26 GMT 1
|
|